Show newer

Friends, for something to be open source, we need to see

1. The data it was trained and evaluated on

2. The code

3. The model architecture

4. The model weights.

DeepSeek only gives 3, 4. And I'll see the day that anyone gives us #1 without being forced to do so, because all of them are stealing data.

OH 

You know shadow clone jutsu isn't real right?
You know polyamory isn't real right?
You know ninjas aren't real right?

C/C++ musing 

I wonder if spawning multiple threads to read files at partitioned offsets and doing merging work to put it back together makes sense when parsing sufficiently large text files... Maybe with pread() I could make something fast, partititioning at units of filesystem block size to avoid cache misses... However I am not sure all the code involved would have thread-safe varieties.

doesn't your microwave have a cabbage setting??

Show thread

I emailed the email address on the garlic we purchased. That's all.

I have mastered posts that serve as their own apology. I am immortal.

silly, self-deprecating, typos 

sory for posting that besties... its was my evil yakubian programming. I will try to be beter!!!!.! 😭

KCachegrind is actually a really nice profiling dump visualizer. Shame it probably won't tell me anything I don't already know.

Jest: "squash commit"? what, does the 'g' in git stand for "gourd"?

Watch out folks.
It is an :ai: scrapes :ai: world out there

"There’s substantial evidence that what DeepSeek did here is they distilled the knowledge out of OpenAI’s models and I don’t think OpenAI is very happy about this."

"I will explain what this means in a moment, but first: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahhahahahahahahahahahahaha.

404media.co/email/855bf870-82c

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.