Goo Truther @thufie@pixie.town

Where'd I get this iFish? Well the government stocks all the ponds, so...

Whoa! You love my political posts?! Check out my YouTubePoop channel!! @thufiefilms

Boom! A second video has hit the Bloofie Films channel!

Find out what Josh had to say when he discovered the Arch of the GNU/Covenant was in North America.

[YTP] Arch of the GNU/Covenant

YouTube link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CE21_OhRfwU

PeerTube link:
https://bark.video/w/6jkKGPzhEiwVzYA4Ti5nsj

I put a lot of work into manually making the English captions, so if you have trouble with un-captioned YouTubePoops, don't worry!

When we get tired of saying "slop" we can revert to saying "spam" at any time. No need to be specific about the authorship of the spam. Spam is spam. Noise instead of real information. Just more spam these days.

Why do bloggers use LLMs to write slop essays? Just paste your ideas, your prompt, into my mind!??

They are not even doing this to cheat for points on an exam, or on a work schedule? Their personal blog. What compels this behavior? Is spamming a recreation for these people? At least email spammers are trying an honest con.

Secular communism is so 70s.

We need to smash, smear, soak, and obstruct sidewalk delivery bots. They are the enemy of us all.

I think some people espouse a critique of great-man theory of history and then proceed to only read their literary works. As a pattern. It bothers me.

I don't remember posting that so I guess it worked. I guess someday I get to feel what it is like getting time-shlorped back to my appropriate referent. Yippie!

Hey! Time traveler here! Just posting up a warning for all of y'all tootie-tooters (that's what we call your generation in the future).

Be advised. Shit's really gonna hit the fan when a prolific lesswrong rationalist blogger/cultist misreads Hegel. Then we're in some serious shit.

Okay thanks for listening. I'm getting time-shlorped so hopefully it worked.

Chair without legs, only arms

I'm very jaded by waxing poetic about literary flourishes and grand statements by communists who've mass murdered anarchists. How do you put aside the records of their actions long enough to take that political fluff text seriously? It helps to understand how easily people of the time thinking themselves blessed by literary wisdom were so easily put to institutions and tasks of murder. Do you need a critical reader edition that contrasts the written statements with the historical dictator's actual *material* (you weirdos like that word) actions on the adjacent reference page? And if so, to what end aside analyzing dimensions of propaganda?

It is honestly a bit worrying to me. It shows a vulnerability to sentiment tied to throwaway lines that were penned as a means to power and just as easily discarded. Which is the shape of now.