Sven Slootweg @joepie91@pixie.town

Are you a freelancer, especially in tech, and you want to help others in need? There's a very easy way to do that sustainably, with very little effort on your part.

Increase your standard rate by $10 (or your equivalent currency) per hour. That's it.

Some clients are going to refuse, you can keep them at the old rate if you want. For all the clients that have accepted the rate (most existing clients will, almost all new clients will), the 'extra' $10/hour is your mutual aid budget.

Every month, you divvy out the budget across the various mutual aid requests you can find at the MutualAid and MutualAidRequest hashtags.

Depending on your exact workload, you can divert hundreds if not thousands of dollars a month towards people in need, and you won't even need to do any extra work for it.

(This only works if you are a genuine freelancer, ie. you maintain your own client relations and it's B2B; it doesn't work for employment-without-benefits scenarios. Outside of western countries you may need to reduce the amount of money, but then this is primarily meant for those in western countries.)

The *reason* this works is because a lot of freelancers under-negotiate their payment terms, and there's plenty of room for rate increases. I forgot who said this, but "the correct price is the one that makes them complain but still pay".

Do I always have my emotions under perfect control? No - nobody does, we're all human, and that includes me.

Do I mean what I say when I'm direct about my disapproval of someone's words or actions? Yes, absolutely. I fully understand how it will come across, and it is *intended* to be abrasive - it is a warning shot cautioning you to reconsider what you are doing or saying, and usually a friendlier one than you will get from many others if you continue with it.

If I tell you off about something, there is an intention behind that, and I ask that you do not try to wave it off as "they must be responding impulsively", but treat it as seriously as I am conveying it.

I don't normally talk about what/when I've donated to mutual aid fundraisers, because it feels kind of like tooting my own horn.

But I'm starting to think that maybe I should, even if just to create an ambient social expectation.

You know what the first step of driving real change is? Acknowledging the hardships of the vulnerable folks in your community, and doing work to support them so that they can be included in the process.

You know what it definitely isn't? Endlessly theorizing in a vacuum about the philosophy of a hypothetical better system while not even wanting to acknowledge that not everybody started from the same point in the first place. That's just theorycrafting.

If you claim that you've given up on leftist politics because "everybody seems much more interested in being miserable together than in actually driving change", and yet you've never so much as acknowledged people's dire situations with a word of solidarity or empathy, then that tells me an awful lot about what you think "leftism" means, and it's nothing flattering.

Bonus points if you're a well-off white dude who most likely works in tech.

"Don't I get to decide for myself what I spend my money on?"

Sure, you do. But other people are going to see those choices and draw conclusions from that about your true priorities and beliefs.

Folks are not expressing their frustration with your donation choices because they believe they have any sort of authority over them - I think we're all pretty well aware that we don't.

Instead, folks are trying to tell you how they - the marginalized folks you claim to be supporting politically, to be clear - *really* feel about the way you put that into practice. Whether you are actually practicing what you're preaching.

Like with everything else, if you want to be an 'ally', you need to be listening to the people you claim to be an ally of, and follow their guidance on how to improve things for them, even if it is something you personally disagree with.

You have the choice not to do that, and to instead go by your own views of what is the best or most effective solution, but then you are not an ally - you're trying to be a *savior*, which is something very different.

That's your choice to make, but then don't call yourself an ally, and don't claim you 'support' marginalized folks, because you don't.

#MastodonForHarris #MastodonForKamala

Apparently it's causing massive issues for RubyGems and PyPI, too.

Oh look, the 'tea' get-paid-to-publish-open-source blockchain thing is vulnerable to the exact same basic attack that had already been spotted by everyone who's looking into developer compensation before (where distributing money based on package count incentivizes making spam packages) and now the npm search is completely useless because it's full of spam.

Like, guys, there's a *reason* many of us never went ahead with implementing this model for maintainer compensation. Because it DOESN'T FUCKING WORK, in ways that are extremely obvious if you'd thought about it for ten seconds.

Actually, to make the question you should be asking more explicit:

Do you really want to get people out of poverty, or do you just want poverty to get out of your view?

If it upsets you more that a bunch of desperate and upset poor folks are begging you for help than that they are, y'know, starving - that seems like a thing you should be reflecting on for a while. #MastodonForHarris