politics meta (not fedi meta), why things never seem to go anywhere
Something that frustrates me is that political discourse and action largely sorts into two buckets:
1. "Everything is fucked and we can't fix it anyway!"
2. "I'm doing my part already by being involved in <some local thing>, what more are you expecting?"
And they are both wrong but for different reasons; "everything is fucked" is a reasonable feeling to have but ultimately doesn't reflect what can *actually* be accomplished with the right organizing, and "I'm already doing my part, I can't do more" is *also* a reasonable feeling but ignores that the idea of a "first step towards progress" only works if you acknowledge that there are many more steps to follow!
And because the second category never ends up achieving large-scale change (because they consider the work done after the first step), the first category never experiences what can be achieved, and so the first category of folks doesn't get involved, and that then causes the second category of folks to keep feeling overextended, and on and on it goes in a circle.
The actual solution here is to start small, with an accessible first step, *and* treat that as a stepping stone towards larger, overarching organization, where you constantly keep pushing for that larger change (even if you personally are not the one doing the work there!).
But both categories of people will tend to reject this idea (often implicitly rather than explicitly), for a different reasons.
How on earth do we resolve this?
@volpeon Sorry, I didn't end up completing that thought... basically it's the same thing I've seen in a lot of political circles, where a complete lack of community and solidarity is what keeps change from occurring because the bar to *organizing* that change is too high for any one person, and building up sustainable solidarity is the only way to deal with that across the board, starting very very small if needed
@volpeon I don't think it's "don't care" so much as "everybody individually feels they can't fix it anyway so they choose to accept it and work around it"
i found this website on accident on the internet.
https://www.betrayingwhiteness.org/
in short, it's a "guided online learning path toward understanding & undermining the constructs of race" and is primarily focused on deconstructing race, class and white supremacy, and is aimed at white folks that wish to do some self-reflection to understand their own bias and work towards a future without white supremacy
i find it useful myself as someone who wants to work on that, so i thought i'd share that w yall
There's a thing that annoys me a lot that I'm going to call the "subtractive fallacy" where whenever you advocate for getting rid of some harmful tech or practice or cultural aspect and the person who wants to pick a fight with you treats it like all you can do is remove: not fix, not replace, not change just leave a gaping hole where something used to be
"abolish the police" => "so we should just let people assault and rob us in our homes and not do anything to stop it"
"end compulsory schooling" => "so children should all be illiterate and never learn anything"
"end car culture" => "so if you can't walk you just won't be able to get anywhere?"
@thomholwerda (And crucially, you may have the right spend your money as you please, but you certainly do not have the right to be free of criticism for doing so)
Hey! Big big work to do!
This week is a GREAT time to get activated!
How, though?
Read on for a framework and some questions to help you figure out where you need to be in the work-- and to help you remember that another world is possible.
We can only get there when we begin to live into it now, in all the ways our values bring it to us today. 🌱❤️
This is true of organizations and societies as well as machines. Rules and norms are a kind of technology, in that they have a similar ability to constrain your choices.
Some things are not allowed because of objective, concrete hazards to people and the continued functioning of the whole system.
Some things are not allowed simply because the powerful wish it to be so.
Knowing which is which is crucial to progress.
It's important to have a good understanding of how technology works.
Not because getting a STEM job is valuable, or because technical knowledge is somehow more important than other types of knowledge.
It's because the powerful will use your ignorance of technology against you.
Systems are designed — out of necessity and intentionally — to constrain your choices. It's important to understand which constraints are technically necessary, and which are just there to exploit or control you.
helping others as a freelancer
Are you a freelancer, especially in tech, and you want to help others in need? There's a very easy way to do that sustainably, with very little effort on your part.
Increase your standard rate by $10 (or your equivalent currency) per hour. That's it.
Some clients are going to refuse, you can keep them at the old rate if you want. For all the clients that have accepted the rate (most existing clients will, almost all new clients will), the 'extra' $10/hour is your mutual aid budget.
Every month, you divvy out the budget across the various mutual aid requests you can find at the MutualAid and MutualAidRequest hashtags.
Depending on your exact workload, you can divert hundreds if not thousands of dollars a month towards people in need, and you won't even need to do any extra work for it.
(This only works if you are a genuine freelancer, ie. you maintain your own client relations and it's B2B; it doesn't work for employment-without-benefits scenarios. Outside of western countries you may need to reduce the amount of money, but then this is primarily meant for those in western countries.)
The *reason* this works is because a lot of freelancers under-negotiate their payment terms, and there's plenty of room for rate increases. I forgot who said this, but "the correct price is the one that makes them complain but still pay".
mastodon for harris
can i just talk to the liberals in the audience please. yall say you are allies, but how am i supposed to trust you when an action as little as a mutual aid donation is something you're not willing to do knowing full well you can? how can you protect someone? how can i trust you that you will stand with me on a protest, or aid when the police starts violence? how can i trust you to risk your privilege for what's right? how can i rely on you?
how?
mastodon for harris
also, people who make fun of the hashtag, i appreciate your work and yall are hilarious, but please don't go too overboard or try to spice things up by reposting people's fundraisers. i just don't want all of that to get buried under shitposts.
we good?
Do I always have my emotions under perfect control? No - nobody does, we're all human, and that includes me.
Do I mean what I say when I'm direct about my disapproval of someone's words or actions? Yes, absolutely. I fully understand how it will come across, and it is *intended* to be abrasive - it is a warning shot cautioning you to reconsider what you are doing or saying, and usually a friendlier one than you will get from many others if you continue with it.
If I tell you off about something, there is an intention behind that, and I ask that you do not try to wave it off as "they must be responding impulsively", but treat it as seriously as I am conveying it.
@james@strangeobject.space Hm. I'm not sure to what degree this is actually an issue, but I feel like that might cause an imbalance where 'blessing' a particular fundraiser with my mention causes money to go there instead of distributed better across all the folks who need it.
I don't want to be "the guy who decides whose bills get paid", even at a smaller scale, to be honest. Even picking out fundraisers is already difficult, knowing that I can't realistically distribute my own donations well (but that at least has a limited/fixed scope of effect).
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.