Show newer

@Stitcher In one case here, it changed "1 teaspoon" to "1/2 teaspoon".

@suzi_1960 @joenepraat Ik zou inderdaad zoiets proberen. Toetsen zijn sterk aan slijtage onderhevig, dat is waarom "doubleshot keycaps" zo'n belangrijke kwaliteits-indicator is voor een toetsenbord, dus je wilt inderdaad e.o.a. vorm van vernis.

Just wondering, would it be possible to buy tabacco at this Albert Heijn?

For those of you with Jenkins in scope;

“Multiple proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits for a critical Jenkins vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files have been made publicly available, with some researchers reporting attackers actively exploiting the flaws in attacks.”

Sorry, but you better go patch.

bleepingcomputer.com/news/secu

@Stitcher It looks like this is using some ChatGPT-esque thing? I tested it out on a recipe, and it made things up (and changed amounts!) that weren't in the original recipe...

the nice thing about my ADHD is that if my apartment is haunted I will literally never notice it

“silly me, always leaving these cupboards and drawers open and the sink running at full blast,” I say, as a frustrated ghost screams into a pillow in the corner

Half the U.S. can't afford rent.

But the economy is doing 'better'.

Something is wrong here.

I think this, a discussion of the parallels between "AI" and "crypto", is a good take. I want to dig into the bit on "AI" being different because it has practical use.

"AI" is a marketing term. There's the stuff that was mainly called "ML" up until 2021 or so, which definitely has practical uses. E.g., if you're running a social network and need to help humans find the toxic stuff, ML can help.

But in the last few years there's a wave of hype mainly around the large language models, LLMs, and the large text-to-image models. So things like ChatGPT and DALL-E. It's really not clear to me those have much more practical use than crypto. Certainly not over their costs. 1/

sfba.social/@misc@mastodon.soc

political campaigning PSA 

Many folks here probably already know this, but it's worth repeating, because I think it's one of the most crucial yet overlooked things about political campaigning:

Always demand *twice* what you're looking to get. People will generally treat 'campaigning for change' like a negotiation, and they will (unfortunately) usually not accept rational arguments by themselves.

If you demand the outcome you want, then your campaign is basically guaranteed to fail; you will get something that's inbetween your demands and the status quo. Doesn't matter how reasonable your demands are, you will not get them.

The purpose of asking for twice what you want is to make the reasonable ask actually *look* reasonable to people, by framing it on a broader spectrum of possibilities.

(If necessary, delegate the "demanding twice what you want" to a separate organization that you can afford to 'burn', so that your main organization looks like the reasonable party.)

Yes, it sucks that this is necessary.

@cafkafk @Saket I don't think that argument would survive people's notion of "tradition", unfortunately

the year is 2050. GTK is still preparing the move to version 4, and has collaborated with the FBI to assassinate anyone who mentions the filepicker thumbnail bug. qt stil has an open source version, but it requires you to have create an account with a valid email address and physical address, and limits applications to only containing one window.

microsoft is still "transitioning away from winforms" to the Multiversal Windows Platform, For Real You Guys, We're Doing It Platform. iOS desktop (formerly macOS) has deprecated all system widgets in favour of the cloud. google has created an artificial intelligence to randomly create and deprecate new GUI frameworks, rendering it essentially impossible for anybody but them to create android apps with "native GUIs".

the only usable framework is electron, but everybody hates it because bloat.

as people struggle to find a desktop ui framework that hasn't been bogged down into uselessness by licensing issues or lack of features, a saviour emerges from the heavens: java swing

@Saket (To be clear, with 'destruction' I mean the category that both 'vandalism' and 'riots' are grouped under by "people who clutch pearls about protest methods" - since they seem to treat them interchangeably, and as fundamentally bad regardless of circumstances or nuance or actual outcomes)

@Saket All the pearl-clutching I've seen has centered around the extremely superficial idea of 'destruction' and how that is 'not an acceptable way to protest', sometimes invoking slippery slope arguments like "but what if next time they do it to an unprotected painting".

Upon further inquiry when people argue this, it then turns out that the only 'acceptable way to protest' to them is something that produces zero inconvenience and has zero risk. Seems to be nothing more to it than that, just the same old tired argument where the only acceptable forms of protest are ineffective ones.

political campaigning PSA 

Many folks here probably already know this, but it's worth repeating, because I think it's one of the most crucial yet overlooked things about political campaigning:

Always demand *twice* what you're looking to get. People will generally treat 'campaigning for change' like a negotiation, and they will (unfortunately) usually not accept rational arguments by themselves.

If you demand the outcome you want, then your campaign is basically guaranteed to fail; you will get something that's inbetween your demands and the status quo. Doesn't matter how reasonable your demands are, you will not get them.

The purpose of asking for twice what you want is to make the reasonable ask actually *look* reasonable to people, by framing it on a broader spectrum of possibilities.

(If necessary, delegate the "demanding twice what you want" to a separate organization that you can afford to 'burn', so that your main organization looks like the reasonable party.)

Yes, it sucks that this is necessary.

On the reach of and ubiquity of white supremacy:

My partner is white, but she also does a lot of work trying to dismantle, teach about, and vocalize/ verbalize the existence and effects of white supremacy, cultural imperialism, and colonialism while teaching younger generations of culinary students in the US (in California, which is relatively more liberal and relatively better educated than many other US states). Also the majority of her students are young adults, and people of color, often in community with various other forms of marginalization.

So as you might expect, she talks and teaches about social justice and antiracism a lot. It's also a pedagogical priority at the college where she teaches.

A few days ago, a student asked why albacore tuna tends to be more expensive than other kinds of canned tuna in US markets. Because my partner is always attributing disparities in demand and economy to the white supremacy, she did so again, with no real basis, sort of jokingly.

But later she researched it and it really is because of white supremacist cultural expectations. And this actually applies to other food products that are "lighter" in color, with a more "refined" or "subtle" taste. In the US, these characteristics are strongly economically tied to white supremacy.

@willemswebstek@todon.nl Je zou bijna denken dat het kapitalisme niet duurzaam is...

Starting with a tiny step to work on something you’ve been avoiding will make it easier to tackle.

@elilla Yeah, it's far from ideal, certainly - feels more like it was designed specifically for "I pay for the server but it's the job of someone else to admin it" and nothing else

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.