Show newer

So apparently removing the DISTINCT cuts the query time in half, but it's still very slow...

With DISTINCT: explain.depesz.com/s/cOeV
Without DISTINCT: explain.depesz.com/s/QAIM5

Show thread

pixie.town statistics:

:garfield: 42 users
:gnomed:​ one little gnome running through the internet pipes delivering all the toots

oh, actually only 4 minutes when the system isn't under load 🙃

Show thread

now to wait for the 13 minute `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` query to complete

@kim I already gave it so many cores though :( I was having load averages of 40+!

well crap, it knocked over the container and now I've lost three whole CPU cores...

Show thread

feeding my datasheet search engine database its favourite treat, a whole CPU core

meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

Heads-up for any folks on hachyderm.io: I would recommend picking a different instance, as it seems likely that it'll get defederated from quite a few places at some point.

They seem to not only be happy with corporate accounts[1], but also apparently seek to "introduce trust with corporations" [and draw them to fedi?], which uhhhh yeah no.

This is a space for people, not for corporations. Let's not repeat the errors of the FOSS community (that eventually led to near-total corporate capture of FOSS) by inviting corporations into our spaces, not even "as long as they play nice".

[1] github.com/hachyderm/community

@tailscale@hachyderm.io That policy seems quite likely to get Hachyderm defederated from other instances, tbh, if it mixes in corporate with personal accounts.

And my concerns about corporate accounts exceed "what I personally wish to see" - it's about their effects on the broader community, and precisely that dangerous area of "corporations that act like they're a community member but ultimately always act in their own best interest". This is precisely how eg. corporate capture of FOSS happened.

re: galactica nonsense 

@ct_bergstrom (specifically, 1. it doesn't expand on the "not always", 2. static typing doesn't *always* require explicit declaration, inference also exists, and 3. from a research perspective it's highly debatable whether it's true at all - ie. exactly the kind of errors I would expect a neural net to make)

Here's the kicker. It's not that Galactica picked the wrong law. It is that the Padua economist to whom Galactica attributes the law, Gianni Brandolini, DOES NOT EXIST.

Galactica's phrasing of the law itself? That does not exist either. No one has ever said that phrase online (rather a surprise, tbh).

Galactica doesn't let us "access and manipulate what we know about the universe." It generates *pure bullshit* — which, incidentally, will be orders of magnitude more difficult to clean up.

Let's take a look. Galactica can generate wikipedia articles, supposedly.

So let's see what they look like. Here's one for Brandolini's law, the principle that bullshit takes another of magnitude less effort create than to clean up.

Left: Galactica's attempt at creating a wikipedia entry
galactica.org/?prompt=wiki+art

Right: The actual wikipedia entry
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandoli

Show thread

I've figured out what pisses me off so much about Facebook's Galactica demo.

It's not because people can use to to write bad essays for their homework. There are plenty of large language models that can do that. It's because Facebook is presenting it as something that it most definitely is not.

Facebook is selling it as a knowledge engine, a "new interface to access and manipulate what we know about the universe."

Actually it's just a random bullshit generator.

galactica.org

galactica nonsense 

@ct_bergstrom lmfao, so few lines and yet it manages to be wrong in multiple ways, none of which would be easily detectable to a typical reader...

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.