It does raise one interesting question though - in cases where you really are one of the few minorities in a bigoted town, is anarchy actually any better for you than modern democracies with civil rights and whatnot? I think so, because there's no apparatus of power for the bigots to capture and use against you, they'd have to do the oppressing themselves, and if there are other minorities a mutual defense association would work as a deterrent. But, it's still a scary thought.
I've been in a multi-day extended (friendly) discussion with a socdem. They keep saying pretty much the same three things:
1. People will somehow vote "more correctly" under "true" democracy whereas under anarchy people will automatically become bigoted conservatives bc of localism
2. Examples of the failure of democracy today are just "badly executed democracy."
3. We need a single reified entity to enforce a set of rules, so we can have a "society."
😂
adhd
@mia Unrealistic; there are at least several "loading.gif"s and "forget what you were doing and walk out of kitchen" missing there ._.
adhd
cofe on a great day:
1. make cofe
cofe on a good day:
1. grind cofe
2. make cofe
3. cleanup
cofe on a bad day:
1. walk into kitchen
2. loading.gif
3. switch on espresso machine boiler
4. turn on scale
5. measure 18.2g of cofe
6. put cofe in grinder
7. grind cofe
8. clean bottom of grinder with brush
9. get portafilter
10. put cofe in portafilter
11. stir cofe
12. tamp cofe
13. attach portafilter
14. put scale on drip tray
15. put cup on scale
16. reset scale
17. slightly open steam valve
18. wait until boiler temp drops below threshold
19. switch on pump for preinfusion
20. wait until boiler gets up to temp
21. close valve and start timer
22. wait 30s for 27g of cofe
23. switch off pump and boiler
24. remove cup and scale from drip tray
25. turn off scale
26. sigh
27. leave portafilter attached
28. pick up cup, look for spoon
29. sigh
30. walk to drawer
31. open drawer, take spoon
32. give cofe a stir
33. sigh at dirty spoon
34. open dish washer
35. sigh at dish washer full of clean dishes
36. drop spoon in sink
37. leave kitchen
So here's a simple-to-understand reason why capitalism, very fundamentally, *cannot* promote innovation:
- Success under capitalism requires scale
- Scale requires a large target market
- Most people will prefer a 'stable' well-understood solution to a new 'scary' innovative one, even when the innovative one is actually better
- Therefore, the best way to succeed under capitalism is to avoid innovation, and only do tried-and-tested things, because that appeals to the biggest target market, and lets you scale up
@Guerin @aral @schratze (For automated testing and static typing, the business argument is basically that they achieve workable results with a minimal upfront training investment and minimal human-to-human coordination, and that they easily scale up to large monolithic teams; none of which is actually relevant outside of business development)
@Guerin @aral @schratze Many of these problems are widely viewed as "well, that's just how software is" or even as best practices (eg. a heavy focus on automated testing or static typing), even though when you *really* start looking into it, you would discover that they are not in fact the optimal solution for software *in general*, they just make a lot of business sense in a commercial environment.
@Guerin @aral @redstarfish@social.linux.pizza @schratze Speaking from experience in a slightly different context (software that's designed for businesses vs. software that's designed for humans/communities), it is *incredibly* difficult to untangle all of the implicit assumptions that have gone into a piece of software, let alone remove them without ending up in perpetual bikesheds. You are often better off starting from scratch.
Like, there's an incredible amount of problems and suboptimal design choices in widely-used software and libraries that can be traced back to "money favours business-oriented development", but it's almost impossible to spot them all, let alone explain to other people (unfamiliar with the topic) why they're a problem.
@redstarfish @schratze Fascist folks will write very useful software for fascist folks. I can’t believe there’s even a debate about whether it’s good to work with fascists if they agree to slap a GPL license on their work.
“Hey, let me introduce you to my friend Chad. He’s a Nazi, but he sure writes some sick code.”
Yeah, no.
*smh*
@darius @ckie I think it depends a lot on context and presentation. In this case though, I'd definitely say that "you have ended up on my timeline. i will now show you nix" is a needlessly smug way to go about it. The whole thing would read very different if it were introduced as "maybe Nix would be an option? as it works out-of-the-box there" instead, for example.
(With the understanding that you'd only need Nix here and not NixOS)
@evelyn@misskey.bubbletea.dev This is not that surprising, considering that any means or understanding of genuine community building has been violently hammered out of 'western' culture, and therefore "affiliating with a corporate Brand" is the closest thing to community-building that most people still have available to them
@f0x I think you have a case of academic kink
@TakeV Almost certainly nowhere near as much as is spent on unnecessary *work*, such as nearly all analytics, marketing and advertising related work.
We've literally got shortages of the materials used to make a load of technology, and corporations are manufacturing non-serviceable, and even disposable versions of that technology.
Fucking capitalism.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.