Homophobia, politics
So, just to recap:
Hungary has a new law that forbids any queer content to be presented in any form to people under 18. This involves all books with any reference to LGBT+ (including, ironically, Harry Potter). These books can only be sold wrapped in plastic, and in the adult section of bookstores. Stores have already been fined for millions of Forints for not complying. This week, they are also being taken off the shelves in some stores completely.
I feel helpless.
Linguistic terms I want to make mainstream:
The Chewbacca agreement.
The peculiar situation of two bilingual but not fully competent individuals that results in each speaking a different language to each other without ever changing to the other speaker's language, that nevertheless produces a perfectly intelligible conversation to them.
Named, of course, after how Chewbacca just howls and chirps but everyone understands him and replies in English.
It is a very frequent situation in regions where more than one language is common or dominant.
home media copy protection
it's widely accepted that copy protection and DRM doesn't prevent piracy. Macrovision didn't prevent piracy, DVD CSS didn't prevent piracy, and BD AACS doesn't prevent piracy. in the digital realm, no form of DRM prevented piracy.
so why do studios and publishers continue to use copy protection?
a common assumption is that they're simply too ignorant or stubborn to give up.
but what if copy protection is nothing to do with piracy, and instead is entirely aimed at controlling legitimate users?
if you buy legitimate copy-protected media, you don't 'own' it in any normal sense. you can't create backups, you can't store it on a media server, you can't transcode it for viewing on a tablet or phone. and to most people this situation seems entirely unremarkable or even expected.
once you condition users to believe that they don't own their media, then it becomes much easier to push other forms of anti-consumer practices. for example, studios hate the first sale doctrine; a populace who have given up ownership of media would be much more likely to support its repeal.
they would be much more likely to support other forms of media distribution, like streaming, where you pay forever and own nothing.
and they're more likely to support other forms of copyright maximalism like copyright term extension, or restricting what public libraries are allowed to do, since the idea of content being publicly owned or available would seem quite alien - in fact, that idea is mostly associated with pirated media nowadays.
if this is the purpose of copy protection, i wouldn't say it's been an unqualified success, but it certainly has been quite effective.
Is there any Mastodon web client where one can enter a Mastodon access key for an account?
I want to give someone posting access, without giving them the full password. I could make a new application key (& secret) and give it to them. If they turn evil, I, with the root password, can revoke it. 🙂
My wishlist for the federated web is an activitypub-enabled phpbb clone (complete with the themes and emotes). I'd kill off my (mostly disused) discord server for Tangerine for it if I could pay a company to do the basic administration for me like you can with mastodon (keeping on top of updates and so on).
If you are horrified by the Web Environment Integrity proposal by Google (#DRM for ads), stop using Chrome and switch to Firefox and block ads everywhere.
The only eyeballs left for Google to show ads are the ones protected by ad blockers. That’s the highest growth opportunity they have, and we cannot let them have it.
Good. The whole concept of cash bail is that people should be detained pre-trial based on how much money they have, instead of whether they're a flight risk or a risk to the community. It's an indefensible system. It should be abolished everywhere.
"The Illinois Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a state law eliminating cash bail. Illinois will now become the first state in the nation to eliminate cash bail when the new law takes effect Sept. 18."
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/illinois-supreme-court-upholds-far-reaching-law-ending-cash-bail
every day i subscribe more to @hannah's theory that all the recent weird tech decisions are executives consulting LLMs
I mean, LLMs would make perfect CEOs
- Confident
- Persuasive
- Well read
- Never admits a mistake, and will degrade you if you point one out to it
- Can make up reasonable sounding bullshit on the spot to explain their every action
- Relies on exploiting the unpaid labor of thousands of people
- Lives in a reality they invent for themselves
- Fundamentally uncreative
Just to recap the latest in the #Redhat RHEL vs downstreams not offering them any value drama:
Redhat publically states that downstream rebuilders offer them no value, and the RHEL community should all be working in the Centos-stream sandbox, because that's where the community is, because it has community right there in the name, and that's where the code fixes can land, and community is only about lines of code in the repo.
@almalinux goes "alright, no value in us being a 1:1 rebuild of RHEL, then we're cutting our own path while being based on Centos-stream, staying ABI compatible with RHEL, but we'll fix our own bugs when we find them"
Alma Linux then finds a CVE in the iperf3 server impacting everyone in the Enterprise Linux 9 ecosystem, so they release the fix for AlmaLinux, and then immediately open pull requests for Fedora and Centos-stream to land the fix upstream. Which would seem to be exactly what Redhat was asking for this whole time.
Redhat's response to the centos-stream pull request? "There is no current customer demand for this fix in RHEL, so we're not interested in this fix"
The astute will notice that the pull request is feeding into centos-stream, and not RHEL. But they're making merge decisions here based on immediate customer demand in RHEL.
So maybe this whole "Centos-stream is the community distro" line was bullshit and it really is just the beta testing ground for RHEL, just like all of us kind of thought it was while getting shouted down by the centos-stream advocates this whole time.
So Redhat is still doing great.
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/iperf3/-/merge_requests/5
re: XMPP, Matrix
That same bunch of people also often tends to be suspiciously close to channer culture, which should maybe be a clue, idk
XMPP, Matrix
So the latest XMPP proponent argument against Matrix was "Element works with cops, that's why you should use XMPP instead"
And here I see a Conversations developer and an ejabberd developer being excited about XMPP being adopted by German cops
It's almost as if the weirdly aggressive arguments coming from those XMPP proponents (it's always the same bunch of people) are made in bad faith
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.