I'm not worried about the AI apocalypse. I'm worried about the "VCs subsidize AI tech and sell it at a loss just long enough to make everyone rely on them (aka 'disrupting the knowledge worker industry') before bumping the price up and quality down just like Uber and Amazon and the rest" apocalypse. #ai #vc
meta, mastodon, vis.social admin
My understanding of Mastodon culture is that consent is a huge part of every feature and practice.
As a moderator, the explosion of images that were created with tools built with apparently stolen artworks, without consent of the artists who created them, was stressful...to put it mildly.
So we asked folks on vis.social to stop posting them. As did other instances.
The push-back was also stressful. So we had to make it a Rule.
tech, outages, rant
The thing with big-brand services having outages due to expired certificates and shit like that, isn't that it's a show of incompetence - this can occasionally happen anywhere.
Rather, the problem are the people who assume "big company, so it's perfect and would never go down or make mistakes", and the corporate propaganda that reinforces those beliefs. It doesn't work that way.
hospital food, funny
*Of course* I would be the one to discover a bug in the food menu; a menu item that is not only non-existent but also has a strange low-sodium classification that made the order-taking person go "????" and is now subject of internal investigation
I truly have the cursed touch
AI, marketing
So, hang on, wait; clearly Google Deep Dream was early marketing for AI art, but... with hindsight, it was deliberate spin to try and push the inherent flaws of the process as advantages, wasn't it?
Deep Dream was a project with the message "AI can find patterns that aren't there and amplify inaccurate information; isn't that so cool?" and, like, no? Turns out, that's bad, actually? It also popularised the term "hallucinations" as a positive-sounding spin on the-thing-where-an-AI-returns-nonsense.
It was surprisingly prescient, in the bad sense of a company realising that tech they were working on wasn't going to work out the way they'd hoped, and getting ahead of public backlash by spinning the issues as intentions. We still can't accurately tell what objects are in a picture (my fave is still the Tesla that thought a horse-drawn carriage was a truck driving straight towards it)... But hey, at least we can turn the picture into a bunch of dogs! Dogs are cute, you like dogs, what's the problem?
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.