Show newer

Filtering online product reviews to only show posts from before the public release of chatGPT like im scavenging shipwrecks for pre-1945 steel

BREAKING: "Loud quitting" trend enters explosive new phase as employees looking to leave their job commit acts of sabotage with well-placed explosives

you would not believe your eyes
if threeeeee fireflies
were to need PHP 8.2

Show thread

NFTs, how to deal with the astroturfing? :boost_requested:​ 

There's a recurring theme with established people/orgs buying into NFT nonsense; where the actual customers/fans/etc. very quickly respond with universal disgust and criticism...

... but then over the next few weeks, once it's no longer news anymore, all the NFT shills and 'investors' (who generally have nothing to do with the org in question) start showing up and drowning the comments in positive encouragements and celebration.

And then for anyone reading back the public response later, it'll seem like the announcement was a great success that was very well-received, because of the sheer volume of astroturfed positive comments.

How would one deal with this effectively? I feel like it's creating a lot of misleading belief in the success of NFTs; both for onlookers, and for the organizations themselves.

When you bring up a strange thing at work and several minutes later it has now become an Incident

NDAs are so transphobic how the hell do i infodump about cool stuff

message for cis people about the trans genocide 

hey cis people

shit's really ramping up with this whole trans genocide

you're gonna start seeing a lot of posts where trans people are trying to crowdfund an escape from one of the places where they're actively being genocided

if you're wondering what can you do to materially help trans people survive the arriving shitstorm... BOOST THESE POSTS

your boost could be the one that makes a difference and puts it in front of the right person to donate

what percentage of buttons in computer software have never been pressed

this is a hard question, especially if you include buttons that no longer exist but were not pressed while they did exist

Compulsory air cleaning in public spaces when

(And yes, this is partly but not exclusively a subtoot of StackExchange)

Show thread

Looking at which organizations and 'communities' are currently happily jumping on the "AI" train while handwaving about vague benefits of it, is going to tell you a lot about who is happy to throw their community under the bus to look cool or investable

It still boggles my mind how companies like Medium and Substack have managed to create hype about their 'revolutionary platforms' which are... literally just blog hosters

- Edit:
Here it is, thanks to
@molly0xfff : incidentdatabase.ai/

- Original question:
Do we have something like "Web3 is going just great" but for A.I.?

If you don't know the project:
@web3isgreat
web3isgoinggreat.com/

#AskFedi #ai #techbros

@requiem It's vastly disappointing how many people (including here) misunderstand both the problems associated with AI and the capabilities of AI in of itself.

* The current capabilities of AI are over-hyped and over estimated. It's fancy pattern recognition. It is by no means intelligent.

* Corporations are abusing it to steal code, art, and thus get rid of jobs.

* AI output is error prone, and always worse than what a skilled human would produce, but bad quality has never stopped a corporation from cheaping out in order to profit.

It is a multiplier in the race to the bottom. Artists, writers, etc,... are all getting massively screwed by having derivatives of their work stolen while at the same time job offers for the more simpler tasks vanish. As if creative people needed another kick while down. And their customers are being screwed by getting worse products in the end.

We're not "scared" of AI because we think it might go skynet on us. It ain't that clever. It's problematic because it gives corporations another way to exploit us. On a massive scale.

And sorry, but "Should have reviewed the code" is a lame excuse. We all know it's harder and slower to properly and thoroughly review code than to write it from scratch, especially for the trivial stuff AI would be used for at this time.

By using AI you're feeding more data to the companies running them which they can assimilate into their models. By using the tools you are accelerating the problem and actively making the world worse.

There is just no reason and no excuse to use AI. Just don't.

This from @mmasnick is so spot on:

“your reputation when you refuse to moderate is not ‘the grand enabler of free speech.’ Because it’s the internet itself that is the grand enabler of free speech. When you’re a private centralized company and you don’t deal with hateful content on your site, you’re the Nazi bar.”

techdirt.com/2023/04/14/substa

I sort of want to shake people who are excited for LLMs because they might be able to synthesize information one day and be like "the reason that it's so hard to synthesize information now is because the exact same companies profit from the strategic disorganization of information by selling it back to us as search, analytics, dashboards, and platforms, and LLMs are the logical conclusion of that exact pattern."

i'm an unfluencer. i erase details of products you were interested in from your brain.

Since one of my friends was shocked to learn that library memberships cost money here: Do you have to pay for using public libraries where you live?

I think this may be the best explanation of how Mastodon works that I've seen in my 5 months of being here.
mattbrown.dev/mastodon/

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.