subtoot of many, frustrated (2)
@hazelnot @freakazoid https://starshipgender.com/disability-driven-development/index.html is a long read but probably very relevant to this topic
subtoot of many, frustrated (3)
And yes I *will* bite if you try to take this thread as an invitation to continue arguing the point, and you are going to get the unfiltered version of my criticism, so you should make very very sure that that is actually what you want before trying to dispute this
AI hellscape gripe
@researchfairy YES! Such a big part of generative AI motivation is consent avoidance
AI hellscape gripe
Saw an ad with a Black person in it that was AI generated
Now I'm thinking about the "digital blackface" aspects of AI image generation
You can have them in an ad to hawk your products, make them participate in your sexual fantasies, make them endorse your ideas
You don't have to hire a Black person, no one has to even look them in the eye to ask them to pose
You can still have bespoke photorealistic video of them doing your bidding and it costs pennies if anything at all
AI hellscape gripe
And this isn't just about not paying a Black person, although that's definitely part of it
It's also about how easy it is to just type a prompt and make a digitally generated image of a Black person doing something that might cross a line or where it would be difficult or infeasible to arrange if you had to convince models, actors or artists to do it
Dot-tk was a rough lesson, but that was a long time ago now.
(They offered free .tk domains in the aughts, got super popular with spammers and malware, and ISTR there were colonization factors as well?).
Is this going to be a generational thing, where every couple decades we get a large-scale public learning experience? .tk, now .af and .io, so in 2040 I dunno, the "union services" .us websites will all be seized for communism or something.
CW-boost: lebanon, aid from rojava
re: ableism
@cy You need to think long and hard about why your default assumption is that someone criticizing the accessibility of open-source must be (paraphrasing) some 'corporate plant' or otherwise malicious actor. Instead of looking inward about what *you* can do to improve the situation.
@cy It's not "consolation" to talk down on people like that and essentially blame them for "allowing them" to do something that they don't even have control over. It's gloating. "Well, but *I* don't have that problem over here in open-source land..."
If you think closed-source code should be illegal, great, I completely agree! So go fight for that yourself instead of placing that expectation on someone else.
subtoot of many, frustrated (2)
Like, I assign great value to the ideas behind open-source, but it's shit like this that makes me wonder whether I actually want to have
anything to do with the broader "open-source community" because it sometimes feels like nobody wants to ask themselves any questions beyond the LICENSE.md
@nazokiyoubinbou @weirdwriter You are giving off the impression that you are trivializing the issue, because you chose to post your "general rant" in response to someone speaking about a personal experience, as if to imply that the personal experience is of less importance than your rant. If it's meant as a "general rant", then why didn't you post it as your own post on your own timeline instead?
Telling someone "it isn't that bad" also isn't helpful. They *live* this experience and so it is vanishingly unlikely that you will have anything useful to add to it, or that your understanding of the situation is better than theirs. Sometimes it is better to just not comment.
If you want to be helpful, then you could offer something along the lines of "do you want me to push for better accessibility for you in projects, or help find something that works better for you?", to take some of the work off their shoulders. What you're doing now is just being defensive and basically invalidating someone's experience while you have zero skin in the game yourself.
In short, what you're doing here is what people are talking about when they complain about "reply guys". Don't do that.
"Everyone always taking the path of least resistance is why [...]"
While this is true in principle, you should be mindful of who you're asking to take the first steps against that (because that's the phase we're in right now), and whether you aren't asking the most marginalized folks to do the most work there.
@cy @weirdwriter Don't make this kind of reply. This doesn't help them in any way and all it does is place *your* expectations on someone else who didn't ask for that.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.