re: hot take, subtoot
This applies doubly so for *security* advice, which is what this is originally subtooting.
politics
@ainmosni @Anke That's collectivism vs. individualism; though those map very closely onto egalitarian vs. hierarchical, because the purpose of individualism is to gain an advantage over others (which is a goal provided by hierarchy) whereas the purpose of collectivism is to collectively move ahead everyone's well-being (which is an egalitarian measure).
Cases of individualism masquerading as collectivism notwithstanding (eg. authoritarian 'communist' governments).
politics
@ainmosni @Anke I mean, this may end up being a definitional issue, but by the only definition I've ever found that makes sense (left = egalitarian, right = hierarchical), bigotry *has* to exist on some level for right-wing ideology to function, because there needs to be a 'lesser' class of people for a 'justified' hierarchy to be able to exist.
@fenandaj@mstdn.social (Om wat specifieker te zijn: "iedereen kan een dader worden" is een belangrijk inzicht voor mensen persoonlijk, om zichzelf niet te vrijwaren - terwijl "de meeste mensen deugen" een belangrijk inzicht is voor hoe je met mensen in gesprek gaat en gezonde gemeenschappen bouwt, zeker als activist)
@fenandaj@mstdn.social Ik vind de framing van dat artikel persoonlijk erg jammer.
De redeneringen an sich kloppen; de dynamiek van leiders en volgelingen, de verschillende motivaties, dat dit iets is waar iedereen in kan vallen, dat klopt allemaal.
Maar vervolgens probeert het dat te contrasteren tegen het boek van Bregman, alsof daarin wordt beweerd dat de meeste mensen goed zijn en geen kwaad kunnen doen - maar dat beweert het helemaal niet! Sterker nog, het benoemt expliciet dat dat niet het geval is.
Zowel "iedereen kan een dader worden" als "de meeste mensen hebben niet de *intentie* om dat te doen" zijn belangrijk inzichten om systemische problemen op te kunnen lossen, en het is wat mij betreft niet zinvol om ze (zoals dit artikel doet) tegenover elkaar te zetten... ze vullen elkaar aan.
CW: software development, open source, kink, nsfw
thinking of how formerly open source corporate like Red Hat or HashiCorp are migrating to more restrictive licenses because they don't want the Big 5 to appropriate their labour, while FOSS people still reject ethical and anti-capitalist licenses in favour of Freedom 0 dogma, even after being repeatedly backstabbed by Apple, Google etc. and after watching their free labour bankroll the likes of Anduril or the IDF.
@scanlime My *suspicion* would be that even if someone offered it, this would be close to unusable for latency reasons; even supposedly latency-tolerant mounts (like sshfs or samba mounts) often end up breaking stuff because of this, so I imagine that an assumed-fast link like iscsi might be even worse :/
PSA: how to keep using ublock origin on chrome
a lot of people are using this as an opportunity to switch to firefox, but some people need to keep using chrome for some things, or just prefer it in general. so:
https://gist.github.com/velzie/053ffedeaecea1a801a2769ab86ab376
Adobe is trying to claim right of access to all of your projects for them to use to train their "AI," regardless of things like NDA, meaning that they are willing to violate HIPAA laws, FERPA laws, and any number of binding civil structures:
https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/06/06/adobes-new-terms-of-service-unacceptably-gives-them-access-to-all-of-your-projects-for-free
If you're in the US, you can contact the FTC here: https://www.ftc.gov/media/71268
and provide them with this contact information
Adobe
345 Park Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110-2704
Tel: 408-536-6000
Fax: 408-537-6000
I don't know the specifics of the process in the EU, but here might be a good place to start:
https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection_en
Too many people don't know how to handle a situation where formerly foundational concepts like "facts" and "the rule of law" are flouted by some and embraced by others.
When it's your job to find cohesive, nuanced truth and someone calls that very concept "devisive" or "political," you Keep Doing Your Job.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.