Show newer

I have just learned that Stardew Valley requires OpenSSL 1.1.1 to run, that therefore it does not work on newer Linux versions, and so people are working around this...

... by running the Windows version under WINE...

... or by manually installing an outdated OpenSSL binary that will never get any updates into their /lib...

:blobcatdead:

meta, subtoot 

If you are loudly wondering what possible *technical* objection people could have to Bluesky bridging, then you have not been paying attention to anything people have been saying on this topic

@filippo And to be clear, boundaries that people set do not actually *need* to satisfy technical or logical requirements of correctness or consistency to be valid in the first place

@filippo "harassment-enforced consent", if that's what we're calling "setting boundaries" now, is the only option we have here *because* there are no effective technical controls, and it is not clear that there *can* be effective controls against bad actors with sufficient bags of money.

If that is something you take issue with, and justifiedly so, I would suggest spending that energy on finding and proposing technical protections, rather than lamenting the fact that people set boundaries

cory doctorow's walkaway net is living in my head now and it is not paying rent

advertising on cookware 

"Lasts 10x longer*
* in an abrasion test, compared against other non-stick coatings. E-mail us for more details at..."

Okay :blobcatthinkingsmirk:

If I thought that "Social Media" meant using X or Facebook... I might agree with "stay away" But, that isn't the whole universe (we know that here, but who else knows?) and these are the kind of people who should know!

In the future social media will be media. The end.

What will that be like? We are building it now. Please for the love of God we need smart people to participate in this project. 4/4

Show thread

Is "stay away" realistic advice for young people? Or for ANY people? It drives me nuts that some of the people with the best judgement, the cooler heads, the deeper thinkers, think that just ignoring social media is a solution.

Any format of information sharing can be "bad" yellow journalism, propaganda TV networks. All media present an opportunity to control the public will and so all media can be put to dishonest uses.

3/

Show thread

We had a really good speaker at our school last year who talked about understanding conflict resolution. Part of an effort to improve student mental health. The only thing I didn't like about her presentation was what she said on social media "Social media? my advice is stay away!" *big audience chuckle from teachers and parents*

And that laugh is because most know we won't *really* stay away. And we admire those who don't use social media like they are training for a marathon. 2/

Show thread

It annoys me how people talk about using social media like it's a vice. And a female-coded one at that.

"Spend less time on social media" is trotted out a virtuous in the same way that "not eating a pint of ice cream" is.

Imagine if in the early days of movable type, there were people going around saying "don't read pamphlets, they are full of misinformation"

Social media is the primary way news is disseminated. It is superseding newspapers and TV as the primary vector of mass media. 1/

CW-boost: parenting, toxic communication 

@KuJoe Oh sure, that is a real problem - but I consider that a cultural and collective one, for which societal awareness needs to exist, rather than something to address on an individual level. The 'actual learning how to deal with it' part doesn't require professional help, once you are aware that it is needed and why, is what I mean.

CW-boost: parenting, toxic communication 

@KuJoe (It also does not require any professional training, it does require a willingness to figure it out)

CW-boost: parenting, toxic communication 

@KuJoe I know why the discomfort happens. It is still a difference between "unfamiliar but could figure it out" and "literally unable to".

CW-boost: parenting, toxic communication 

@KuJoe This is not a learnable skill for many ND folks, that is the problem. It's expecting them to do something they literally cannot.

CW-boost: parenting, toxic communication 

@KuJoe And so the straightforward, direct form of communication is at least nominally possible to understand for everyone involved, whereas the passive-aggressive unspoken-implication form is not.

CW-boost: parenting, toxic communication 

@KuJoe The one point I would tend to disagree with is "they are both correct", because there's one significant difference: neurotypical folks are often uncomfortable with neurodivergent communication, whereas neurodivergent folks are often *actually unable* to understand neurotypical communication.

@passenger @dalfen @noondlyt The world doesn’t need Mozilla. The world needs an organisation that actually does what Mozilla says it does.

@kescher @n0toose@chaos.social I don't know what the 'correct' pronunciation is, but I usually say it as 'fordjo' and nobody seems to have been bothered by that so far

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.