@bram Honestly any claim that "the Netherlands ain't that racist or xenophobic" is immediately disqualified by virtue of the PVV and FvD continuing to exist with meaningful seats
Just be really REALLY careful when you read anything from or a domain with Chrome or Google in the name about exciting new standard web APIs. Much too often what they are promoting is effectively a proprietary API that other browser vendors have serious concerns about.
Edited so as to not tar web.dev with the same brush as the rest, as I genuinely think they are trying to do the right thing. You still need to be careful reading it, though, as they don't always succeed.
long
@dvzrv@chaos.social I have to admit that I'm slightly confused about the nature of this article.
It seems to imply that NGI is breaking some sort of principle of neutrality, but I've never known NGI as an organization that *claims* to be neutral to begin with? I've always seen it communicated as having a subjective selection round. Maybe they claim neutrality somewhere, but I missed it?
Is the argument here that it shouldn't have subjective selection? Because then the article doesn't seem to do much by way of providing arguments for that (or reasoning about how true neutrality would even be possible here).
Is the argument that the subjective selection should be on the basis of different judgment criteria? Because the article doesn't seem to provide any explanation of how it should be judged instead, and why.
Is it just meant as a heads-up for people working on non-Nix package managers that applying for a grant is unlikely to succeed? Because then I don't understand why there's all the focus on a "conflict of interest" - it seems that a much shorter article would suffice.
So I genuinely don't understand what point the article is trying to make here exactly?
(I do think that rejecting a grant application with a generic message is not really okay, but that seems to be a separate issue from what the rest of the article talks about.)
@jt_rebelo @smallcircles @josh I'm talking about people using them for their own gardens, yeah.
And even if you're a municipality, then you have much more effective leaf-blowing methods at your disposal than the common implementation of "walking around with them in the same spot for an hour": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90jiTpAul-o
@ben Oh and also it just *feels* fast and pleasant to use
@ben At least for mod installing/uninstalling/etc.: OpenTTD.
- It isn't the fucking Steam Workshop with its horrendous version compatibility handling
- It Just Works
- It can automatically enable or disable relevant mods for specific saves or multiplayer servers, without requiring a game restart
@thcrt (Also, removing leaves from large garden areas wrecks the local ecosystem anyway)
@thcrt This is the Netherlands, "large gardens" are not really a thing here
@aeva To quote the venerable eevee:
"What’s less great is a team of highly-paid and highly-skilled people all using Chrome on a recent Mac Pro, developing in an office half a mile from almost every server they hit, then turning around and scoffing at people who don’t have exactly the same setup."
re: Mobilizon details, long-ish
@Photorat Yeah, that's entirely fair. I hope you'll find enough people to make it work :) Good luck!
@aeva Ah, I thought you were saying that someone was actively *advising* that the limit should be 10 minutes, which would be... even more absurd than it being that in practice
Mobilizon details, long-ish
@Photorat Looking into it a bit further, what I've found so far:
- Mobilizon groups can be followed from eg. Mastodon to get updates: https://docs.joinmobilizon.org/use/users/follow-federation/
- But you cannot participate in other ways from Mastodon: https://framacolibri.org/t/integration-with-mastodon/16446
- It does not seem specified whether you can use one Mobilizon account to fully participate on another Mobilizon instance (but the way the rest of the documentation is written, it seems to imply you can't: https://docs.joinmobilizon.org/use/administration/federation/)
- You *can*, however, open a group for 'anonymous' participation, so that people can sign up for events without an account at all. This seems to be limited to registering your participation in an event, however.
So I think that if you want everyone fully 'on board', and able to fully participate in the group, they would probably all need an account on the specific instance that the group exists on.
@aeva ... ten minutes??? Surely that was meant to say 'seconds'? Right?
@Photorat I haven't had an opportunity to try it myself yet, but I've seen people talk about using Mobilizon for this somewhat regularly - it seems to be fedi-based group/event organizing software. Might be worth looking into?
(Of course that doesn't answer the "is anyone interested" part of the question!)
@hazelnot Wait, why are there leaves on your living room carpet
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.