Sven Slootweg (soft-deprecated) @joepie91@pixie.town

@bananas Err, film tablets*

@bananas It's also really explicit about how you're not allowed to pulverize it

@bananas These are just film capsules; a similar text was on the box of both the brand-name stuff (CellCept) and the generic replacement

@deneb

"aka. "you may not use firefox to abuse mozilla's services"."

It's not at all clear that that's what it means; "the AUP" could just as easily be interpreted to mean "the bulletpoint list", which then applies to Mozilla services *and* things that explicitly say the AUP is to be followed (ie. the browser). This is in fact the common interpretation of AUPs that I've seen in other places.

"my point was though, removing the old blanket statement does not in itself change anything, and they have valid reasons for removing it, however bad that looks"

The point is that a lot of people do not feel that those are 'valid reasons' at all (because the reasons are 'we want to be able to sell data'), and that is precisely why people are getting upset about this. That, and Mozilla reneging on their supposed forever-promise of not selling data, and what that implies about its future, *in the context of all the other stuff*, like them acquiring an advertising company.

This was never just about a ToS change. It's about the trajectory that Mozilla has been on for the past years, and the full picture of how it has been changing. The ToS change just made it explicit. Arguing that people didn't understand the ToS changes 100% correctly, even regardless of whether that is the case, completely misses the point of the complaint.

@StroomAfwaarts https://www.lidl.nl/p/silvercrest-kitchen-tools-elektrische-aardappelschiller/p100378285

@StroomAfwaarts Heh, the thing I was looking at actually was designed to be both things :) I didn't buy it though, we don't peel potatoes here usually

@artemist Yikes.