Update 1.1: added a line about profits and changed to a free license.
#Piracy #AdBlock #YouTube #Netflix #Invidious #DRM #Torrent #P2P #FileSharing #Ads #Piped #Streaming #StreamingServices
@dominicstucki @jon Every time I see a picture of (or interact with) a ticket machine elsewhere, I am reminded of how good we still have it here with the NS ticket machines...
(They're not quite as good in some ways as the old ones with physical buttons, though. But that's definitely never coming back.)
Details are here, for anyone who wants to see some concrete numbers: https://github.com/oxigraph/oxigraph/discussions/924
reference to abusers
@hipsterelectron @foolishowl @skye Both of these things happen in practice; ostracizing mechanisms being misused by abusers, as well as people being prematurely ostracized through emergent community dynamics with no ill intentions. Different types of problems with their own solutions.
I also feel like the original post already addressed this point sufficiently to make clear what the intention was; it did not call for the opposite, it called for 'something inbetween' (which implies addressing *both* issues, which is actually harmed by framing it as a binary choice between 'always ostracize' and 'never ostracize' because many conflict-averse people *will* choose the latter).
I am very much in favour of less- or non-hierarchical moderation approaches as well. But making that actually work in practice requires recognizing that harmful ostracizing *can* still happen without hierarchy, and that that's a thing you need to account for in your culture.
@JetlagJen @skye I... sort of half disagree on the "impossible to quantify" part? Like, it is correct in the most literal sense, but IMO the more important thing is that it's not really *necessary* to quantify exactly.
Generally speaking the people who are unwilling to change, are *very very obviously* unwilling to change, to the point that to anyone vaguely familiar with the signs, there's really not any doubt.
That leaves a small amount of cases where it really is difficult to deal with as a community (think "always immediately promises to change but never does"), but those are generally few enough that they can be collectively handled on a case-by-case basis.
subtooting hackernews
@me But that's the thing, though? The best way to ensure that would be to push for change in Git itself, improvements to the unintuitive stuff, so that people don't walk away and abandon Git?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Non-Binary_People%27s_Day
> The day was first celebrated in 2012, started by Katje van Loon. The date was chosen for being precisely midway between International Men's Day and International Women's Day.
I laughed
Happy NB people's day!
subtooting hackernews
Every single time there's a thread on HN about the issues with Git, it doesn't matter what, there *will* be people jumping in defending it as "it's not that hard, you must just not have taken the time to learn it".
And the fact that such vast swathes of developers, including highly experienced ones, continue to find it unintuitive and unpleasant to work with, *somehow* doesn't register to them as a signal that maybe the problem is actually with Git itself...
I really don't understand people who behave like this. How many people need to complain about something before you're willing to concede that maybe there's room for improvement? Why are you so invested in insisting that it's perfect?
@Schouten_B @McCovican @mathew @RenewedRebecca the attitude of an ethical technology company should be that they provide an unsurprising technology that has their interests at heart - including getting consent from them for features that they might not like. it should not be that the users don't know what they want and it's too complicated to explain things to them
Why mutual aid is better than giving to charity (a few of many reasons):
- your money has the most impact on someone's reality if you give it directly to them. none goes into overheads, processing, payroll, marketing, etc
- real people right now have dire problems that cash can instantly solve
- your community (the place where you belong, not a distant separate place) improves and so your life benefits
- people's lives, when you boil down all the world's problems, are the highest priority
Finally made my first demo with Slipstream!
@Violet 's monitor got damaged on the way to the Black Valley @demoparty_no party, so in a life-giving-you-lemons exercise, I decided to make it into a one-of-a-kind custom demo platform using the remaining pixels. One soundtrack from @vurpo later and we were in business...
CW: abuse
These mental models can't really be avoided.
I don't have a magic solution other than to just be aware of the toll of that kind of self-criticism and self-regulation.
It can take on a life of its own. It can persist even after you get away from the person or people who it was created to protect you from.
CW: abuse
To anticipate what an abuser might do next you have a little copy of the abuser running in your mind like a virtual machine. You start viewing all of your actions through the lens of how that abuser might react.
And since you need to anticipate what they will do, you keep it on overdrive... there is a danger that the warped perceptions and prejudices that enable their abuse start to become your own.
You start taking on some of the work of "keeping you in your place" yourself.
CW: abuse
It's pretty common (and in some ways unavoidable) to have a mental model of your abuser in your mind. You practice anticipating what the abuser will think of you, how they will see you, so you can anticipate what they might do next. This is why victims often have a granular understanding of the motivations, passions & concerns of the people who harm them, while those doing the harm often know nearly nothing about the people they attack.
This model is useful but it's also dangerous.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.