@joenepraat @x_screamodeath_x @Ravotr @Jo Oh, I know it's not specific to anarchist circles. But anarchists are the ones where this most obviously violates the stated ideology.
@perigee I likely caught it at the very start of the pandemic, back when there was no testing infrastructure yet - which is why I simply don't know :/
I love itch.io as a platform, and I can understand if they need to serve ads when people download stuff for free, but this is not okay -- they are serving what's most likely a type of malware in an ad that's designed to trick people who are trying to download the project. I honestly don't think I can stay on the platform if they keep doing this -- I don't want to put people who download my projects at risk.
@joenepraat @x_screamodeath_x @Ravotr @Jo Unfortunately that largely hasn't translated into *actual* safety measures for COVID, though.
I'm still almost every time reading about an announcement for some nominally anarchist event, and then be unable to find any information whatsoever about what COVID precautions they have taken.
Or consider meetings; sure, hybrid meetings are a thing. But what if you can't do online meetings due to auditory processing issues, *and* also are particularly susceptible to COVID?
That would be me, and I continue to feel excluded from a lot that's going on. Ableism is still widespread, despite it being called out at times.
Really feeling the exhaustion of living in a world where the default is that I will be misunderstood and judged.
LLM stuff, "public good"
Arguing that LLMs are a positive development because they can be used for public good is all well and good, but that would be a much more credible argument if people were actually appropriately credited and compensated for the labour that went into the training data used for that
Like, this discussion would look very different in a society where there's eg. universal basic income, capitalism has been abolished entirely, or there's some other "everyone is taken care of" solution, but that's not the society we live in and that should raise some Questions about any "public good" argument, because exactly whose "public" are we talking about here?
re: Wildebeest (making fun of)
@kescher "We're totally in this for the long run! For the health of the fediverse! It's totally not a cheap shot at taking things over that we will abandon at the first sign that it might fail to successfully scale up to be a monopolist!"
Where does all of this leave the Firefox browser. Surman argued that the organization is very judicious about rolling AI into the browser — but he also believes that AI will become part of everything Mozilla does.
I can't wait to find out what will happen when all the Firefox evangelists wake up to find an LLM baked into their darling.@sofia@chaos.social I find this difficult to answer because of how I define 'protest'; as an expression of objection to something that one doesn't have agency over.
In a literal interpretation, a society would only be anarchist to me if it *did* give people agency over what affects them - so either protests are an impossible concept, or the society is not anarchist (and therefore not free) to begin with.
But if I interpret the term more loosely, there are certainly going to be plenty of *disagreements* and *objections* in an anarchist society, and they might be passionate and vocal. It's just that they would manifest (and be resolved) differently from what we know as 'protest' today.
re: eugenics, autism
This includes research into "identifying autism before birth", to be clear. The only possible purpose of that is to eradicate autistic people. It's eugenics.
Naming things is so powerful. I recently learned about the concept of "Cruel Optimism" coined by Lauren Berlant.
I haven't read up much on it yet, but my naive understanding so far is: "optimism" as in "you could be safe/healthy/happy/etc if you just do X"; and "cruel" because it fails to acknowledge the very barriers to being safe, healthy, happy etc. are also barriers to "just doing X".
eugenics, autism
Your periodic reminder that "curing autism" is not commendable; it is eugenics, and should be called out as such wherever it appears.
Things might be different if we lived in a world of consent and agency. But we do not, and that means that a "cure" for autism means eradication of autistic people, *not* freedom of choice.
This thought brought to you by me thinking back to a piece of malware 20+ years ago that called itself "the game", and that upon execution would backdoor the system and start fucking with it
Changing your desktop background to distorted versions of images on your system, trying to creep you out, causing various parts of the system to glitch, only to after X days inform you that its work was done and delete itself
I never was able to figure out where this came from, or what it was, nobody I've talked to about it seems to recognize it
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.