@maia @fries@tech.lgbt ah yes, the "all my devices must be NixOS yesterday" stage of adoption
biblically accurate vlc
🏴☠️ stolen from someone who didn't provide source or alt text
original: http://www.newamericanpublicart.com/protected-knowledge 🐘
looking at a flamegraph in despair, realizing there's nothing major I can actually change, off the top of my head, but also realizing the cost of certain stuff.
33% of application time is spent _just_ on serde_json::de.
10% on alloc::sync::Arc<T>::drop_slow for a single type of thing.
And a whopping 42.47% on tokio::runtime::task::raw::pol<tokio::runtime::blocking::task::BlockingTask>, which makes me wonder if I'm just misunderstanding something, or whether Tokio just has a *ton* of overhead.
I don't really know where to go from here. I can't really make anything faster than serde, and trying to shove those serde_json::de into the blocking task pool didn't change anything, so I assume it's already being done async enough.
I don't really know what the deal is with that Arc::drop_slow, but that's only 10% and I'm hoping to get *at least* a nice solid 30% improvement before I feel like I'm doing something worthwhile.
Anyone know Tokio enough to understand a flamegraph for something that uses it?
"believe victims"
Seeing people talking about "believe victims don't go looking for evidence before blocking".
This is an easily weaponised policy unfortunately and it is frequently unclear who is a victim.
Believing victims is important. When someone says they've been hurt, believe them.
Buy when implementing harm reduction, the rule should be:
TRUST, BUT VERIFY.
re: "believe victims"
@chican3ry Thanks, this resolves something I've been unable to put into words so far - the distinction between recognizing harm and implementing countermeasures.
So I was checking my logs and people report me to me all the time, but I got a report from mas.to, who has defederated with me, which is fine, but what was said got my attention.
They called me racist and said I didn't use content warnings for my content, which we've discussed at length this week, and how entitled it is. We all know that's just white people shit.
But they say I attack people. This is a bald-faced lie. If you look at every single one of my contentious moments with other users on here, they come at me. I don't attack people. I defend myself. 100% of the time. I do not go after people. That's not my thing, and I have zero interest in the lives of bigots and people who just don't like me for whatever reason.
Earlier in the week, I talked about how much understanding there is for bigotry and hate on the fedi but that isn't extended to it's targets.
The situation is with mas.to is a perfect example of this.
I would urge caution for anyone who interacts with that instance as they've shown a tolerance for bigotry but none for people who are harassed and targeted by it.
@bright_helpings I suspect it's a kneejerk response - there seems to be something neurotype-related behind this accessibility need (for both light-on-dark and dark-on-light cases!), and for a *long* time, the light-on-dark folks weren't catered to at all.
So a culture developed around the stuff that *does* have dark mode, as did a community of folks *making* stuff dark mode... and some subset of that is where the vitriol seems to come from now.
I, in the nicest possible way, do not care if people like/prefer/need dark mode. Or light mode! It's a real "difference of opinion" situation; your choice doesn't affect anyone else so do what you like!
I just think both should be options, both should be treated as equally important in development, and no one should be mean to the individual people using the other.
It's just weird that the failures to do this, that I see anyway, all seem to be on one side of this dark/light binary.
death
Sir Alfred Mehran, the guy who lived at the CDG airport for many years, has apparently died :(
@aredridel @cobalt @Are0h Yep, more details here: https://rage.love/@Em/109314017531332548
choosing a Mastodon instance/server, special heads-up for mastodon.social users
Since so many people are joining mastodon.social right now, including some really unpleasant-to-deal-with people, and since mastodon.social doesn't have a lot of hands-on moderation to dissuade the unpleasant folks, some other instances are talking about "defederating" from mastodon.social. That would mean that, if your account is on mastodon.social, folks on other servers would be less likely to get/read your posts.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.