Show newer

@kescher @himbeer And with "on technical matters" I mean stuff like HN folks rejecting real solutions to real software development problems because it somehow doesn't fit into their imaginary thought-experiment world, and they're envisioning non-existent problems being caused by it, apparently completely unaware that the solution already exists and it doesn't have any of those issues in practice.

It's literally the exact same broken reasoning and attitude applied to both social and technical issues, and even the evidently wrong conclusions in a technical context are apparently not enough to make them realize that they're going about it the wrong way... it's kind of a darkly impressive amount of tunnel vision, really.

@rune I have had more than one USian get aggressively confused at me when I told them we don't have school buses in NL.

"So you're forcing every parent to drive their kids to school before going to work?!"

... no? Have you considered that better solutions might exist?

mini software dev rant 

It boggles my mind how it's *still* a widespread belief that libraries/frameworks must be opinionated "because otherwise people would get lost in the options" - as if "technically forcing people into a specific choice" (with all of its significant downsides) is somehow the only possible way to help guide someone towards a sensible solution.

@kescher @himbeer More specifically: HN is almost entirely composed of the kind of rich privileged white tech dudes who can afford to turn any acute and real problem into some hypothetical thought experiment as if the answer doesn't matter and it's just a game. And they do. Constantly. About everything. Even on technical matters.

@aral While I do think this is a real issue (and *yet another* reason why ESM is not a suitable replacement for CJS), it should be noted that hot-reloading modules is never a safe thing to do in JS regardless of the module system - the language does not provide sufficient state isolation guarantees to prevent state leaking between versions of modules, and this can lead to very strange non-reproducible bugs.

If we allow such concentrations of power, we place ourselves at the mercy of the moral fiber of whoever claims it, because ultimately they will not be accountable to anyone else. And eventually, either the people put in power will begin to use it for their own gain, as I said, or those who are more ruthless and more comfortable ordering people around (because anyone whose long term goal truly is freedom can never be comfortable destroying it) will rise to power and take advantage themselves.

Show thread

MLs really think that you can undo the harm caused by hierarchies, power imbalances, and authority by making a way worse and more concentrated version of them and then waiting for them to abolish themselves, just because "when it's our guys in charge they'll always stick to the plan and do what's right." What they don't realize is that power doesn't just corrupt, it *seduces* and *reveals.* Remove the restraints of equal power around you and few can resist using power for their own gain.

launching a fedi instance that blocks all mentions of a certain queen instance-wide

The year is 2122, we have seized the means of production, public transport is free and easily available, the few cars that still drive do so autonomously with zero accidents, Half Life 3 has been released and all our power needs are fulfilled by nuclear fusion.
You update your Linux system:
( 1/23) upgrading xorg-server

@phoenix@chaos.social If you order a big one, they probably just unplug the coffee machine and give it to you

Something to think about: there are lots of plausible solutions to long-standing problems that you will never hear about - because the people with the solutions stopped talking about them publicly, as they were constantly laughed out of the room or harassed over them, just because they were unconventional solutions or broke with tradition.

financial dependence is *such* an effective tool of abuse, that we really should be working together as a society for things like ubi, and universal health care, if for no other reason than to reduce the levels of power abusive employers, spouses and parents have over theur victims.

it wasn’t obvious to me but it’s so clear now that virtually all conservative policies are about increasing those power imbalances

:boosts_ok_gay: more resources on (accessible) color palette design highly appreciated!

Show thread

they are apparently still around. also from their finance reports it seems they got *at least* a $200.000 investment to start... for essentially a non-federating fediverse instance

Show thread
Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.