starless @starless@pixie.town

@j3s how did it go?

@crash I wonder if the professor changed their course materials to try to account for that.

My favorite professor would say "if most students get it right, and you get it wrong, it's on you. If most students get it wrong, but some get it right, it should go on the final, and if everybody gets it wrong, that's on me, and I need to change how I'm teaching it."

Like, don't get me wrong, that sounds frustrating and heart-breaking, but they were in that course to learn.

What a thing to chew on, though. Oof.

@astrid this reminded me of you.

@fack mine are plastic with a little handle shape molded into em. They stack and are easy to manage.

But yeah, it's a lot of coffee. Cold brew batch, perhaps?

@fack I confess, I have been using the same coffee containers ever since college.

@fack put it in the dedicated 'give away' zone that the residents have established for the purpose.

@fack @aurynn idk, only somewhat, no pressure

@fack hey, have you followed much of @aurynn 's work around this? Y'all might have similar goals

@thufie yeah, agreed. Some years, places have opened up. I guess we'll see what happens here. It will get much colder than this this winter. Hopefully, the snow insulates stuff okay. Maybe the park cops won't evict people on Christmas day.

Damn, fuck this timeline.

@thufie

Idk how familiar you are with local homelessness politics, but they're very hardcore. We tried to get the police to stop violently evicting encampments earlier this fall. The measure failed.

Most activists I know that work on things like this burn out in under a year. Being able to safely and continually fight this fight is very important, and I worry that the approach you outline won't work for most people who read it here.

Anyways, here's the basic story:
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2022/10/20/minneapolis-city-council-declines-pausing-homeless-encampment-evictions

Inviting folks into private homes seems fine until it's been a over week and the temps are 'only' fifteen below zero and there is still someone living in the living room you work remotely from.

I've dealt with situations like this on my own in the past, and it's just too destabilizing for me. It's too self-destructive. Not to be a filthy moderate or whatever, but it *really* fucked me up.

Heater bloc donations, jacket/warm gear funds and donations, asking/pressuring churches, hotels, shelters, and public spaces to keep their doors unlocked through the night, and political organizing work are things that might be more accessible, even if you don't have space for another person in your home. If time is easier to donate, software work to create and maintain an inventory management system and text line for Southside harm reduction are also needs.

The militant destruction of encampments is, in my opinion, a much greater threat to safety and autonomy than the temps themselves. It is disgusting, expensive, unprofessional, inhumane, unethical, and illegal, and yet there continue to be violent raids on encampments in Minneapolis. To me, personally, this is the systemic place where the most violent of injustices can be allayed. If we do not de-criminalize living in a public space, people cannot stabilize their lives. These evictions are violent, traumatic, and unnecessary.

I hate to push back against your very simple demand, but for local folks, please: ask yourself if you can realistically help someone through this. Before inviting someone into your home, decide with yourself and the people you live with what boundaries you are comfortable with, and be fucking honest with yourself about what you can and cannot safely do. Do the other person the service of knowing yourself and your own shit without just assuming that you can help them with theirs. It's often simpler to organize your friends together to help pay for a hotel room.

Here's some background context from someone who helped get that violent anti-encampment, anti-person measure discussed, organized the major protest and encampment, and was in the room for the discussion:

> They voted to not vote on our demands this morning. It was complicated bureaucratic bullshit. They voted just before that vote to change the entire structure of the city govt to give the mayor all of the power - and then claimed they no longer had the power to direct city staff to stop destroying encampments. They literally voted away their own power so they didn't have to address this issue. [...]

> It's disturbing that they changed the city structure like that even without their militant response to homeless people. Nobody knows how this new system is even supposed to work. When the council had power, they were the democracy-- the legislative body. But the conservative members voted to give all of that away to the mayors office-- essentially like Trump skipping any kind of scrutiny by making a ton of executive orders. [...]

> [MPR] didn't talk about how the council made themselves obsolete just before the moratorium vote, so the bit about questioning whether it is within their purview to tell staff to stop burning camps is a distinctly smug and gloating move from the councilmember who represents the richest and whitest ward in the city.

Anyways, if the revolution is not inclusive, it's not the revolution. There's a hundred different ways to fight this fight. Fight the best way for you.