AI hellscape gripe
@researchfairy YES! Such a big part of generative AI motivation is consent avoidance
AI hellscape gripe
Saw an ad with a Black person in it that was AI generated
Now I'm thinking about the "digital blackface" aspects of AI image generation
You can have them in an ad to hawk your products, make them participate in your sexual fantasies, make them endorse your ideas
You don't have to hire a Black person, no one has to even look them in the eye to ask them to pose
You can still have bespoke photorealistic video of them doing your bidding and it costs pennies if anything at all
AI hellscape gripe
And this isn't just about not paying a Black person, although that's definitely part of it
It's also about how easy it is to just type a prompt and make a digitally generated image of a Black person doing something that might cross a line or where it would be difficult or infeasible to arrange if you had to convince models, actors or artists to do it
Dot-tk was a rough lesson, but that was a long time ago now.
(They offered free .tk domains in the aughts, got super popular with spammers and malware, and ISTR there were colonization factors as well?).
Is this going to be a generational thing, where every couple decades we get a large-scale public learning experience? .tk, now .af and .io, so in 2040 I dunno, the "union services" .us websites will all be seized for communism or something.
CW-boost: lebanon, aid from rojava
subtoot of many, frustrated (2)
Like, I assign great value to the ideas behind open-source, but it's shit like this that makes me wonder whether I actually want to have
anything to do with the broader "open-source community" because it sometimes feels like nobody wants to ask themselves any questions beyond the LICENSE.md
mastodon drama
the reason for the "show it anyway" change is that the community has amply adopted the CW field for not just content warnings but:
- polite content descriptors for topics that aren't particularly triggering but some people just want them to be opt-in for any reason
- overflow dampener for trending topics that overly dominate timelines
- subject indicator plus collapse mechanism for long toots/threads
- a way to offer advice or comments "if wanted"
- set up for jokes
- other stuff I don't even know
and gargron likely thinks everybody is doing it wrong and wants to coax us all into using it as a content warning field, strictly.
the reasons that gargron would want that, are probably 1) that he's into playing number games and figured out that less CWs=more exposure/knee-jerk reactions/controversy = Engagement, and 2) that he's got a long history as a control freak who gets off on putting down community wishes to exert his individual will top-down.
@Devourer_ITA I think that was pale moon but I’m constantly amazed as to why open source developers act baffled that institutions and otherwise that require accessibility use corporate/mainstream/big tech tools, including the educational markets. Educational markets require that anything they use be accessible to disabled users. This hasn’t caught on with open source developers yet
Open source: you all should use open source and private services because we’re not a corporation out to exploit you or your data.
Disabled users: hey, your registration edit field is not labeled so I can’t use my adaptive technology to register or even use your platform. Could you fix it, because, right now, the mainstream/corporate offering has taken accessibility more seriously and I’d rather use a tool/service that I won’t need to struggle with in order to operate.
Open source: what exactly do you expect? We can’t be expected to make things accessible for you, so you can either fork it yourself or just not use our software/services. We’re a small team and corporation has more money than we do so they can devote more time and effort to accessibility. You can always fork the project though and make accessibility yourself!
Disabled user: well, I can’t code, so it looks like I don’t have any other choice but to go back to using this corporate offering that at least took the time to label their registration field correctly and actually took my request more seriously. Oh well, maybe open source tools just aren’t for me.
Somewhat recently, I've started using chopsticks.
And I think it's a wonderful example of just how good we are at tool use.
I had basically no experience with them, they seemed alien to me for a while, then I watched one short video and suddenly was...passable at it.
Like any other tool, you (eventually, generally) don't think about moving your fingers, only about what you want the tool to do, even if it might seem strange and complex to the uneducated.
If you’re also put off by the new content warning styling, please vote on this issue:
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.