Show newer

It certainly feels like a lot of things around the situation that were set in motion some time ago, are starting to resolve themselves

radical education meta 

"But how would we have <some technology> if not for capitalism?" is a misquestion, and you should not attempt to answer it. It is not relevant and will detract from the point.

We already have that technology. Abolishing capitalism does not require reinventing it. It can simply be used as-is, if it is needed. That problem is solved, and there is no moral imperative that says we should stop using it if we abolish capitalism.

What actually matters is whether a non-capitalist society could provide for people's needs going forward, and continue to improve itself over time, and *that* is the question to be answering. You don't measure that by considering work that has already been done.

i've had this little sarcastic banner at the bottom of my nextcloud instance forever and i keep updating the line count each time i do a major upgrade

everyone i have figured it out, cats just have unchecked integer operations

> The assertion that Determinate Systems “owns” Nix or seeks to exert outsized influence over the project, the community, or the foundation is patently false: I am the only member of the Nix team who works for Determinate Systems.

Posted on the Detsys website, later pointing to the Detsys CoC and Detsys-controlled Discord.

The guy did not even posted that on a community-owned medium and went full corporate.

🤦

I mostly gave Eelco, Graham and Detsys the benefit of the doubt so far.

I was wrong. Not being an insider, looking how they communicate, it really seems like they are definitely trying to fork the community project and release something on their own…

nixos, subtoot 

That having been said, I am cautiously optimistic about how many people deciding to leave are still open to returning to a hypothetical better community if it were to come into existence. This might end with a bit less collateral damage than usual for these sorts of conflicts.

Show thread

nixos, subtoot 

"All the people opposing weapons manufacturers must be from the US" is one of the more hilariously absurd takes that nevertheless seems to keep coming back.

venting 

Like, I'm fine with people newly getting involved in the conversation, but when it's so clear that this is a long-running situation, do your fucking homework first before commenting the same tired takes we've heard a hundred times before

Show thread

Lot of "I don't really understand what this is about but I'm going to insert my opinion anyway" going around in land lately

I think people working for companies like Anduril or Palantir deserve to be shunned and pushed out of any communal space on tech. These are people who willingly choose to work making the killing of other people more efficient and easy. I'm ok, happy even, with them not feeling welcome in FOSS.

OH “It is very crowded in this train” (looks around, empty seats everywhere) “so, until Kortrijk the first class is also available with second class tickets” :blobcatgooglyshrug:

I think something that many might not realize about large open source projects like #nixos is that despite a huge number of contributors:

1. Number of contributions follows a power law.
2. Contributors aren't fungible, instead it's tens-hundreds of individual SPOFs.
3. Willingness to put your time to fix problems for others (not just stuff you have a personal interest in) is highly correlated with strong ethics.

=> Piss off the wrong 5 people and the project grinds to a halt within a month.

At the end of Friday 3 May ICM 4011, the oldest Koploper still in service at :ns_nl_b: , is leaving active service, after more than 40 years.

3rd most active contributor to #nixos drops from the project due to the lack of leadership from the Foundation supposedly backing the project.

Everything is fine, I'm sure the arms dealers will compensate the lost contributions. /s

github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/

taxes 

Love spending a bunch of time trying to track down a 4-cent deviation between my books and what my bank says, only to discover that the bank's data export listed a transaction on Dec 31 but it's listed in the e-banking UI for Jan 3 of the next year

(The use of the words 'eject' and 'intend' are intentional here; I do not believe that different licensing terms are a solution to this problem; it is a social problem, not a legal one)

Show thread

Or to phrase it differently: a public commons can only actually work, if you eject those who only ever intend to take from it

Show thread
Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.