Matrix homeserver development be like
* 10 minutes of writing code
* 2 hours of trying to work out a spec omission and asking people
* 5 minutes of writing code
* 30 minutes of filing spec issues
* 15 minutes of writing code
* two days of waiting for clarification on something ambiguous in the spec
I like the premise of the protocol, but sheesh, the spec has some serious quality issues, and it's making it almost impossible to get anything done on my homeserver project without losing focus, because the whole thing constantly blocks on spec holes
Can we get an experienced IETF RFC writer on this or something?
If anyone thinks it's impossible to pick up any traction on the Fediverse, it's worth noting that I usually get hundreds of notifications a /day/.
I'm not trying to brag, my point is that it happens because I'm not afraid to reach out and actually try interacting with people. You can't just come and expect people to come to you, you have to actually be willing to engage.
Fedi is an interactive experience and it works better when you treat it as such, instead of just a window into someone else's thoughts.
the future of the web, Google Chrome
During this other backlash which also has very
serious and important implications both for the web specifically and general-purpose computing at large, don't forget that the Google employees who are spearheading this assault on our freedom have names and addresses.
Question about #Matrix homeserver #development: is there actually anywhere in the spec that defines *exactly* what the expected behaviour is when some of the events in prev_events are not known to you and you want to do stateres?
I've been searching for an hour and for the life of me I can't find it.
(To be clear, I'm talking about an exact process description, not an inference of what the spec "probably" means.)
@aral As predicted:
https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/issues/28
✔️ Within 3 days at most, there'll be a statement expressing their surprise how this proposal was received
✔️ They will regret that they were not able to "express" their "intentions" more "clearly", to avoid "misunderstandings"
✔️ That specific repo will be locked. Comments on that statement won't be permitted
ToDo: Within 3-6 months, this attempt will resurface, probably under a different name, and certainly on a different platform
CSAM meta
Begging for people wanting to do "CSAM research" or other such high-profile things, to first *talk to an established CSA prevention organization* before doing the thing. Yes, this also applies to academics.
It's an incredibly complex topic, far more complex than it seems at first glance, and it's incredibly easy to make things *worse* for abuse victims rather than better, without realizing it.
If it helps, think of it as the equivalent of cryptography: don't roll your own research until you have become deeply familiar with the field and have feedback from peers.
I have a new hashtag proposal: #AskMeAbout
To participate in the hashtag, simply make a post listing 3-5 topics that you know a lot about and would feel comfortable discussing with other folks. Be sure to include the #AskMeAbout hashtag in your post!
Then, folks browsing the hashtag can hop on your post with their questions!
Just remembered my all-time favourite bug, where Android accidentally rendered the name of the "Grunt" tool on its webpage as "Dorkq" https://github.com/gruntjs/gruntjs.com/issues/81
Still amazed by Finnair's apparent obsession with blueberry juice - not only do they (an airline!) have their own brand of blueberry juice, which I think you can even buy in supermarkets, they've also apparently made it a central feature of some custom-built logistics game that you can play on their in-flight WiFi
How any of this happened, I have no idea
health, negative
Well, with how my kidney medication is going, I don't think a last-minute ticket for CCCamp is in the cards for me :(
It's nothing particularly serious, but I'm definitely gonna have to dial in my medication again, and that's not something I can really do cross-border at a campsite...
calckey/firefish meta
It's a good thing that the Firefish folks have recognized their error, but I also can't help but observe that "we didn't notice they were nazis, and didn't actively check" conveys a certain... privilege
Like, there are rather a lot of people who cannot afford *not* to check, and allyship is about recognizing that others are bearing that sort of burden, and voluntarily taking over some of it
So if you're not in a habit of checking for nazis, and you wish to be an ally, well, then maybe you should *start* having that habit
mastodon.art meta
Further investigation of the allegations against mastodon.art yields:
- No receipts, evidence, or concrete details, not in any subthreads or side threads either that I can see
- Lots of evasive answers about exactly what is being alleged
- Two people agreeing that mastodon.art is in the wrong
- One of which signed up to the UfoI (the no-defederation pact)
- The other of which operates an instance that's well-known for originating harassment
So, uh, yeah, I think I'm gonna call this one 'case closed'.
No individual wants to hear how their beliefs/attitude originate from their privilege, generally getting angry that you're "generalizing"
... even when those beliefs and that privilege have an almost perfect correlation when observing "people" in general, and by definition the person with the privilege won't have this perspective to draw from, because to them those beliefs just look universal and "normal" (again, because of their privilege)
And I have no idea how to even begin addressing this
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.