What if an operating system were designed not to maximize speed, but to minimize things getting in your way?
Not for branding, but for consistency?
Not for seeing everything all at once, but for seeing only those things you care about at any given time?
Not for commerce and work, but for the things that you *want* to do?
Not for stressing you out with technical things to deal with, but for being a beacon of relaxation?
That makes you go "ahh, finally, back to a calm place" every time you start using it, rather than inspiring anger?
geweld, 'panden sluiten'
"De politie ziet dat er ook ondernemers worden afgeperst, meldt de NOS. Verschillende horecazaken kregen daar een dreigbrief: wie niet betaalt, wordt 'gesloten'. Criminelen lijken hier te anticiperen op het beleid van burgemeesters om getroffen panden tijdelijk te sluiten."
Ja, uh, goh. Datgene waarvan iedereen wist dat het zou gaan gebeuren, gebeurde.
Wanneer gaan we dat belachelijke "panden sluiten"-beleid nou eens afschaffen? Het levert alleen maar aan de lopende band ellende op.
@kouhai so the people selling ads would like to lock modified browsers out of the internet? Yeah that ain't sus
You know what would make the web much, much safer, for everyone, regardless of what device or operating system they are on?
Not serving malware in the form of ads, not injecting many kilobytes of minimized spyware into everything in the name of "analytics", not mining everything in sight for "AI", and definitely not poisoning the entire web with all of the above.
That'd buy us a whole lot more than whatever this "Web Environment Integrity" thing is.
Just saying.
This is not to say that "trusted computing" is *always* malicious, but... you better be prepared to come up with hard evidence that it isn't, if you're going to propose it, and a solid plan on how to keep it from turning *into* something malicious
Ah yes, browser DRM: https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity
This sort of shit is why I distrust any sort of "trusted computing" shit and rhetoric by default, because it is so often a front for DRM
H/t @emilymbender
""...Timnit Gebru and Emily M Bender have echoed Cameron's concerns — they have long argued that AI systems like ChatGPT & Google Bard lack the capacity to comprehend the meaning or significance of the words they process..."
Excuse me Business Insider if there's any echoing to be done he is echoing OUR concerns not the other way around smh. One can always count on the discounting of women's expertise.
https://www.businessinsider.com/james-cameron-ai-scripts-regurgitated-word-salad-2023-7
And yes, fixing this includes dropping the inane "reporting requirements" and "milestones" and "monthly meetings" and whatnot, and just letting people do a thing that you already have an indication that they want to do anyway, and trusting them to do so at their own pace
Deal with it, and stop trying to fucking minmax every part of the process
If your grants system primarily funds already-well-off people in privileged positions and a lot of social/professional connections, and it so often does, then your system sucks
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.