re: grumbling about the light/dark theme discourse
This whole thing uncomfortably reminds me of the more general tendency to see different inclusivity and accessibility needs as "competing with each other in importance", rather than as a reason for mutual solidarity
An absolute plague in individualist politics, to be honest
grumbling about the light/dark theme discourse
I've seen a lot of grumbling about the lack of light themes lately, and those complaints are generally valid, but also
Y'all do realize that this was *exactly* the situation for people who couldn't use light themes until a few years ago, right?
Depending on the ambient light level I have (different) issues with both light *and* dark themes so I get to experience *both* sides of the problem on a daily basis...
And I gotta say that I'm very unhappy seeing the current discussion framed as "dark themes are inaccessible" without any acknowledgment at all that *both* are problematic for different people for different reasons, and that the real solution there is for *both* options to always be available
What would a doctrine of squatter's rights look like for digital places?
I don't really think this is realistic. It would be nice if there were provisions to more easily turn a website over to collective ownership. Leave it to the users to keep the server coffers full. There are places that work in this manner but in a legal sense they aren't really governed this way. Almost always there are 1 or 2 people who could simply shut the place down. Or let it slowly fall apart neglecting software.
Online communities are real communities. People have met future spouses, weathered difficult life events, organized politically, raised money to help each other all through the panoply of social websites.
Often community rules and culture are guided by moderators, who almost always work for free.
Despite all of this we generally accept that these are not the people who own the website or the ones who control its fate.
Over and over this creates heartache and disappointment.
on bad necrocomputing takes
Sometimes I see takes like "computers used to be able to do the same job using way less resources, software is shit nowadays"
And I can only wonder whether they've ever developed software back when real-time compositing was unaffordably expensive, and so was proper process isolation, and a million other 'modern conveniences' that make software, y'know, not suck
@cemhend not that I know of unfortunately, though at the least pleroma's history as a gnusoc frontend and having been hosted on gitgud is verified by the git history for the pleroma-fe readme https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma-fe/-/commits/develop/README.md
I wonder if there's any games out there that exploit the "moving black shape on an OLED screen" phenomenon
I found the post, here's a thread of me banging on about about how recency-focused social media makes good stuff harder to find
https://mstdn.social/@ifixcoinops/110401485793795904
It took me a bit to find it because I had to scroll past all the memes and shite I posted since then
Grumbling about Open Science advocacy
Open Science advocate: You can tell we're doing it right because even big companies are getting on-board with Open Access! Open Access means better science!
Large corporations: (Under their breath) It also means an extra $4000 Open Access charge per article
Open Science advocate: Huh?
Large corporations: We just love uhh transparency, actually
Open Science advocate: 😍
Grumbling about Open Science advocacy
Open Science advocate: I got a great idea, let's uncritically emulate the Free Software community, their goals and tools! They did everything right!
Large corporations: Hey we'd like to exploit your naivete to advance our own narrow interests
Open Science advocate: (Checks notes) Omg the plan is working already
Grumbling about Open Science advocacy
Corporations managed to manipulate us
Into getting government funding institutions to mandate
That we pay those corporations a huge sum of money over and over
To waive the rights to protection of their copyright
That is granted to them by the government
If we cared about openness in any meaningful sense
We would just abolish that form of copyright
just found out about the twitch stuff
they announced that putting any graphics related to a brand larger than 3% of the stream size into your stream or ANY advertisements that are not done via jeff bezos amazon twitch will get you banned
then 1 day later after everyone complained on twitter and threatened to leave, they removed the weirdly arbitrary 3% rule and removed the infographic explaining the advertising restrictions from the help article
the restrictions are still in the terms of service, along with a new rule that you are not allowed to stream simultaneously on twitch and any other platform even if you make no money from twitch and have no business agreement with twitch
and if you're a twitch partner or affiliate and you decide you don't want to agree to the new terms of service, twitch will charge you $25
(This is not really specific to React, of course, this sort of shit is widespread among "faster than X" projects)
isolation sucks
Being chronically ill and isolated sucks.
Yet society is deadset on making itself as hostile as possible for people like me to survive in it. I wish our communities fought against the normalization of death/mass-disablement and did more collective action like mutual aid. Instead, folks like me get tossed out as inconvenient and left behind.
It hurts even more when my communities claim to 'leave no one behind' and yet people like me (millions of us) are being left behind anyway due to lack of accessibility (Covid mitigations are part of accessibility by the way) and mutual aid to aid in our survival in an increasingly warming, hostile-to-life world.
It's so... exhausting and dispiriting.
Check in with disabled people. Aid us and support us, and please stop leaving us behind. Be accessible, please.
#Accessibility #MutualAid #CollectiveCare #PandemicMitigations #StopIsolatingDisabledPeople
No random open source application, I do not want to join your Discord channel for support.
There's this really cool technology called hypertext markup language, and if you use it for your documentation another piece of amazing technology called a search engine can help me find the answer I'm looking for
And the real magic is you only have to answer it once and the answer helps anyone. You don't have to answer the same question every day. This frees you up for more fun development
aggressive mall cop, ableism
So today, joepie went to Walibi Belgium and almost got into a fight with one of the security people working there.
I wonder whether it's standard policy to respond to something unsafely-designed breaking off a ride, by ejecting guests from the park, extorting them, and then trying to restrain them - emphasis on "trying", dude was all muscle with no strength and the panic visibly set in once he realized I wasn't falling for his intimidation tactics.
"You need to pay 800 euro to replace it, otherwise we have to call the cops and you will be here for a couple of hours"
And having the fucking gall to claim that I was obviously intentionally breaking it because I pushed down on it. As a kidney patient I need to support myself on my arms to be able to get out safely, asshole. It's not *my* problem that your ride isn't designed correctly, and you're lucky this didn't end with me falling down.
It's a small consolation that mister security guard probably came away from this with more stress than I did; he was clearly not prepared for an apparent weak target to bite back... and the aggression was very much predatory.
I'm physically fine, cops have taken statements (and already concluded from security footage that it was obviously accidental), and I'm back home now. To be continued. I definitely want *at the very least* an apology from Walibi Belgium for the way I've been treated there.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.