SVB failure
So Y Combinator is calling on the government to compensate for Silicon Valley Bank's failure.
But here's the thing - their petition is full of high-and-mighty talk about how employees' livelihoods should be protected.
... and then they call for the affected corporations to be made whole. Not the employees, but the owners/bosses. Suddenly it's not really about the employees anymore, now that they've outlived their usefulness as a debate prop!
I'm sure the government doesn't want to be handling payroll for individual employees, but there are a lot of reasonable solutions that could've been called for here, and this is what they went with instead.
Capitalist vultures gonna capitalist vulture I guess, socializing the losses.
"But what about ___?" you might ask! The answer is simple: No. You literally don't need them in your life, the world spun fine before them and will spin fine after them 😘
Anyway, on a more serious note, a lot of problems will be solved very easily if you immediately defederate from any/all activitypub servers ran by any sort of tech or social media company.
Easy-peasy, no worries, Bob's your uncle, a few clicks and it's done, just like that ![]()
Their imperatives are not your imperatives, don't need them x
re: nlpol demos
https://nos.nl/video/2467113-zo-ging-het-er-vandaag-aan-toe-in-den-haag
and as the NOS put it "there's a horrible amount of police presence" (at the climate demo)
If I could change one thing about the way we talk about copyright, it would be to replace "protected" with "encumbered," at least in the library context. An out-of-print book from 1950 with a dead author and a defunct publisher is not "protected" by copyright; it's encumbered. 60-year-old newspaper articles, 10-year-old political ads, on and on - vast swaths of in-copyright material with no commercial life but some remaining intellectual value aren't protected by copyright. They're encumbered.
And it hasn't too post this for a while, but just a thought on content warning, which has become a lot less prevalent in the last six months:
CW on Masto isn't about censorship. Its about not retraumatising people who have suffered abuse.
That's it. The Twitter algorithm wants you continually raw with trauma, because it's good for engagement.
For a personal example: I have a couple of major triggers. If I see those triggers CW'd? On a bad day, I'll scroll past.
And that's what it's for.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.