The closer I get to this stuff, the clearer it is to me that "addict/surveil/extract/sell" biz models have ruined the internet really are wrecking mental health, propagating disinfo, dissolving social cohesion, etc. with very little real compensating upside. I think the case for this gets stronger everyday. But there is a TON of resistance to this among "tech people" generally, even those who work for places that would benefit from the demise of surveillance capitalism.
So you get real discomfort from tech people around even pretty weak proposals for beefed up privacy protections. You get this kind of squirming uneasiness even from tech folks who DO see that surveillance capitalism biz models are problematic. They still find it hard to reconcile themselves to the idea that nearly their entire industry, and their own wealth, is based on companies following the money within a legal structure that left basic rights unprotected against new technical capabilities.
kink-adj but mostly dunking on the cishets, adhd lol
thinking about that one time i googled for doggirl memes but ended up reading an article on "puppyplay kink" on a mostly sfw capitalist cishetnormative lifestyle website and whenever the article mentioned ppl engaging in this, even if it was just hypothetical ppl, it always pointed out that they are heterosexual. like every paragraph was like "puppyplay is a heterosexual kink that many heterosexuals like to engage in for heterosexual reasons in a heterosexual way", explicitely using the word heterosexual excessively all over the place. and anyways my takeaway from this is that heterosexuality is so fragile that the cishets need constant reaffirmation that a kink is heterosexuality-compatible in order to be able to practice it lol
“You always told me it takes time. It has taken my father’s time, my mother’s time, my uncle’s time, my brothers’ and my sisters’ time, my nieces’ and my nephews’ time. How much time do you want for your ‘progress’?” —James Baldwin
re: being "overly sectarian"
@thufie With those 'calls for unity' in general, it sure is interesting how they always come from the folks with lower standards or less ambitious goals, and it's never *them* who are willing to compromise on that, it must always be other people.
(The water-less plastic recycling processes I've seen seem to always boil down to some form of "press the pellets into a new shape under high pressure and temperature", which isn't a very flexible manufacturing method)
Something else to note (not in the video) is that recycling dyes and otherwise reducing wastewater is typically something that barely any attention is paid to with the recycling that happens in NA/EU. Other countries are much further ahead on this.
There are very similar issues with plastic recycling - there's only a few recycling processes used in NA/EU that require low or little water, and they're typically only used for manufacturing 'low-grade goods' (think plastic bollards).
This is quite cool, a jeans recycling facility that manages to recycle the *dye* - something that very frequently gets ignored in recycling processes (and is responsible for a lot of pollution): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV_-yJ6NiP8
I think one of #rust #rustlang 's greatest contributions to the field isn't the borrow checker--it's that marginalized folks openly participate, front-and-center, and are celebrated as they do the work. We are visible, appreciated, and often in leadership positions, and this is all facilitated by the community and the community standards that were set up from the get-go.
Compare to how most of our field works, where so many of the women or PoC we appreciate only get appreciated many years later, when someone digs up an actual story of their contribution that had been buried by, frankly, cis white dudes that sucked the air out of the room for so long.
Meanwhile, you throw a rock and you'll hit half-a-dozen absolutely-essential-and-foundational Rust developers and leaders and everyone knows about them already.
re: section 230
Relatedly: "well we're too busy dealing with the problem to not hyperbolize the issue" doesn't really fly as an argument, because somehow outside of the US we *never* get that leeway, nor solidarity from the US for our issues here
Instead, people either assume that we must be talking about the US and immediately detach when we clarify that we're not, or straight-up get angry about not stating so upfront
Somehow we're all expected to care about US issues, but when shit goes down here (see eg. chat control), all solidarity in the other direction immediately evaporates
This fucking sucks and US folks need to do better
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.