Show newer

subtoot, but evergreen 

Honestly if you are always criticizing problematic behaviour by others but cannot accept it when someone calls out something *you* do, you should probably introspect about why that is

I think one of #rust #rustlang 's greatest contributions to the field isn't the borrow checker--it's that marginalized folks openly participate, front-and-center, and are celebrated as they do the work. We are visible, appreciated, and often in leadership positions, and this is all facilitated by the community and the community standards that were set up from the get-go.

Compare to how most of our field works, where so many of the women or PoC we appreciate only get appreciated many years later, when someone digs up an actual story of their contribution that had been buried by, frankly, cis white dudes that sucked the air out of the room for so long.

Meanwhile, you throw a rock and you'll hit half-a-dozen absolutely-essential-and-foundational Rust developers and leaders and everyone knows about them already.

Some journalists will believe Bing is a living being deserving of dignity and rights before they'll believe it about trans people

Edit: I love you all but I gotta mute this (plz like/boost notifs bundling when?)

re: section 230 

Relatedly: "well we're too busy dealing with the problem to not hyperbolize the issue" doesn't really fly as an argument, because somehow outside of the US we *never* get that leeway, nor solidarity from the US for our issues here

Instead, people either assume that we must be talking about the US and immediately detach when we clarify that we're not, or straight-up get angry about not stating so upfront

Somehow we're all expected to care about US issues, but when shit goes down here (see eg. chat control), all solidarity in the other direction immediately evaporates

This fucking sucks and US folks need to do better

Show thread
How does article 17 of the GDPR ("right to erasure") apply to trained LLMs?

Could I request that my personal information be removed from ChatGPT's trained weights, if it exists?

Would they realistically be able to comply with that request? What happens if they can't?

I don’t understand the attraction of being able to talk to computers using breezy casual conversational language; I’ve been telling these little digital bastards what to do for decades using extremely precise formalised language and they still get it wrong

section 230 

The world is not just the US, the internet is also not just the US, and Section 230 is not the only piece of legislation that deals with these sorts of matters, nor necessarily the best one

Neues Fahrgastinfokonzept: Negierte Informationen geben Reisenden Sicherheit, vor welchen Orten sie sich auf der völlig unvorhersehbaren Heimfahrt immerhin nicht fürchten müssen.

"opinions are my own"
seems like a really tautological, cargo-culty thing to write down. like "no copyright intended"

does it do anything?
internet says: (in the usa) maybe

it *doesn't* stop your employer from firing you for any reason

it makes it less likely that somebody could claim you're speaking as an agent of your employer and successfully sue *them*

it's a little gift for your bosses, to make them less nervous about the dangerously unvetted thoughts you might have outside work hours

Mental health tip as I see increasingly fewer things on the TL behind CW: You can mute certain posters temporarily! I typically use 1wk for hot topics.

When I found social media was severely impacting my mental health, I started using the following test for whether I wanted to keep hearing about certain subjects' doom and gloom:
- Is this new to me or am I aware of the larger trend?
- Will learning about this change my actions for the better?

If no to both, mute generously.

Someone, not a friend exactly, just someone whose content I enjoy and with whom my very limited interactions have been nothing but pleasant, is having some issues with transphobic asshats. I see this happen so often, and there's precious little I can do about it, but I've noticed a few facts:

1. Tech is just fucking *full* of LGBTQA+ folk, especially so with transgender people.

2. Society is incapable of functioning without the work tech people do.

3. Staffing levels in modern business are such that less than 3% of the workforce in any given company failing to show up for work for any period of time greater than a few hours breaks things.

Combined, those factors make me begin to wonder what would happen if all the tech queers just went on general strike for better treatment by society at large.

hm yes, just as im about to do something again my energy is like 'see ya nerd'

anteaters are really sneaking under the radar.

You look and you say "ah yes, long nose for long tongue. Necessary for eating ants."

OK, fine but what about the rest of it

I want a dialog box for every single spot on my body that pops up and asks me "do you want hair here? Yes/No/Cancel"

i boosted this site earlier but i think it deserves more explanation. this is a search engine for images that shows you the copyright status for the image right there front and center and you can filter for them. for instance i grabbed this copyright 0 image of an echidna from there. and it even generated a citation for me: "Echidna on the move" by CazzJj is marked with CC0 1.0. i think this is a really easy way for getting a reference image while ensuring the person who took the image consents to its use! openverse.org/

many parents are concerned that not enough bricks have been thrown through the windows of the new york times

Show thread

Roses are red, coding is pain
git push --force origin main

Show thread

Pet peeve: people who respond to an explicit call for abolition with something along the lines of "yeah I agree that it should be reformed"

That is not what I fucking said

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.