I am begging people, talk to your artists that you appreciate.
Give them some encouragement. Tell them what you love. Gush a bit even.
If it wasn’t for some random DM in my inbox this morning, I’d be taking my internal compulsion to close up shop a lot more seriously tonight than I am.
Artists are tired, exhausted even.
I am *lucky* to do this as a glorified hobby.
Others’ abilities to get bread on the table depend on coin that isn’t coming in.
Don’t leave words left unsaid as well.
One thing that annoys me greatly whenever it happens is a mismatch in artist's name spelling in metadata of different albums (e.g "System of a Down" vs "System Of A Down"), causing them to get displayed twice in most audio players.
At least on Linux I can easily `metaflac --set-tag` all of them at once with a single command lol
In Loving Memory of Square Checkbox
Holy shit. This from 65daysofstatics most recent Patreon post:
"Here is a major issue we are currently tussling with. Since we started work on Wreckage Systems, the notions of generative/procedural art and, in particular, 'A.I.' have become increasingly loaded terms. As we hopefully made clear in various posts over the last few years (this one comes to mind), we are deeply, deeply sceptical about A.I. and all the algorithmic and technological answers being carelessly thrown at what are actually political and structural problems in the name of progress/infinite growth/capitalism-is-fine-actually-and-will-save-us-from-climate-change-honest. 65LABS has picked a side, and it is Team Luddite. Against us, these tech bros are not only destroying the internet, not only devaluing art, not only making the already-precarious lives for creative workers even more precarious, not only failing to understand that the meaning and magic of art is not contained in its particular combination of pixels or samples but rather created in the ripples of social relations that any piece of art makes as it pushes its way into the world, not only are they failing to understand that making art is, at best, to clumsily capture a snapshot of something larger, a fragile, flawed, always-incomplete communication of intent from one/some humans to others, NOT ONLY ALL THAT, but also (and yes, admittedly more trivially), they have tarnished this curious little space of computer-based art that uses generative tools to make itself. Because they do not use these tools in the name of exploring liquid, impermanent art that flutters around a recognisable core but never achieves a single, fixed state. They are employing them solely to be able to dig faster to the bottom of lowest common denominator Generic Internet Content."
All of this.
For those of you with Jenkins in scope;
“Multiple proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits for a critical Jenkins vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files have been made publicly available, with some researchers reporting attackers actively exploiting the flaws in attacks.”
Sorry, but you better go patch.
covid news
A new study from Sweden 🇸🇪 suggests that mild COVID-19 can cause several years of "brain fog"
via: https://twitter.com/killedbyproxy/status/1751280158814715934
I think this, a discussion of the parallels between "AI" and "crypto", is a good take. I want to dig into the bit on "AI" being different because it has practical use.
"AI" is a marketing term. There's the stuff that was mainly called "ML" up until 2021 or so, which definitely has practical uses. E.g., if you're running a social network and need to help humans find the toxic stuff, ML can help.
But in the last few years there's a wave of hype mainly around the large language models, LLMs, and the large text-to-image models. So things like ChatGPT and DALL-E. It's really not clear to me those have much more practical use than crypto. Certainly not over their costs. 1/
https://sfba.social/@misc@mastodon.social/111754701923644674
political campaigning PSA
Many folks here probably already know this, but it's worth repeating, because I think it's one of the most crucial yet overlooked things about political campaigning:
Always demand *twice* what you're looking to get. People will generally treat 'campaigning for change' like a negotiation, and they will (unfortunately) usually not accept rational arguments by themselves.
If you demand the outcome you want, then your campaign is basically guaranteed to fail; you will get something that's inbetween your demands and the status quo. Doesn't matter how reasonable your demands are, you will not get them.
The purpose of asking for twice what you want is to make the reasonable ask actually *look* reasonable to people, by framing it on a broader spectrum of possibilities.
(If necessary, delegate the "demanding twice what you want" to a separate organization that you can afford to 'burn', so that your main organization looks like the reasonable party.)
Yes, it sucks that this is necessary.
the year is 2050. GTK is still preparing the move to version 4, and has collaborated with the FBI to assassinate anyone who mentions the filepicker thumbnail bug. qt stil has an open source version, but it requires you to have create an account with a valid email address and physical address, and limits applications to only containing one window.
microsoft is still "transitioning away from winforms" to the Multiversal Windows Platform, For Real You Guys, We're Doing It Platform. iOS desktop (formerly macOS) has deprecated all system widgets in favour of the cloud. google has created an artificial intelligence to randomly create and deprecate new GUI frameworks, rendering it essentially impossible for anybody but them to create android apps with "native GUIs".
the only usable framework is electron, but everybody hates it because bloat.
as people struggle to find a desktop ui framework that hasn't been bogged down into uselessness by licensing issues or lack of features, a saviour emerges from the heavens: java swing
political campaigning PSA
Many folks here probably already know this, but it's worth repeating, because I think it's one of the most crucial yet overlooked things about political campaigning:
Always demand *twice* what you're looking to get. People will generally treat 'campaigning for change' like a negotiation, and they will (unfortunately) usually not accept rational arguments by themselves.
If you demand the outcome you want, then your campaign is basically guaranteed to fail; you will get something that's inbetween your demands and the status quo. Doesn't matter how reasonable your demands are, you will not get them.
The purpose of asking for twice what you want is to make the reasonable ask actually *look* reasonable to people, by framing it on a broader spectrum of possibilities.
(If necessary, delegate the "demanding twice what you want" to a separate organization that you can afford to 'burn', so that your main organization looks like the reasonable party.)
Yes, it sucks that this is necessary.
On the reach of and ubiquity of white supremacy:
My partner is white, but she also does a lot of work trying to dismantle, teach about, and vocalize/ verbalize the existence and effects of white supremacy, cultural imperialism, and colonialism while teaching younger generations of culinary students in the US (in California, which is relatively more liberal and relatively better educated than many other US states). Also the majority of her students are young adults, and people of color, often in community with various other forms of marginalization.
So as you might expect, she talks and teaches about social justice and antiracism a lot. It's also a pedagogical priority at the college where she teaches.
A few days ago, a student asked why albacore tuna tends to be more expensive than other kinds of canned tuna in US markets. Because my partner is always attributing disparities in demand and economy to the white supremacy, she did so again, with no real basis, sort of jokingly.
But later she researched it and it really is because of white supremacist cultural expectations. And this actually applies to other food products that are "lighter" in color, with a more "refined" or "subtle" taste. In the US, these characteristics are strongly economically tied to white supremacy.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.