Show newer

Matrix homeserver development be like

* 10 minutes of writing code
* 2 hours of trying to work out a spec omission and asking people
* 5 minutes of writing code
* 30 minutes of filing spec issues
* 15 minutes of writing code
* two days of waiting for clarification on something ambiguous in the spec

I like the premise of the protocol, but sheesh, the spec has some serious quality issues, and it's making it almost impossible to get anything done on my homeserver project without losing focus, because the whole thing constantly blocks on spec holes

Can we get an experienced IETF RFC writer on this or something?

If anyone thinks it's impossible to pick up any traction on the Fediverse, it's worth noting that I usually get hundreds of notifications a /day/.

I'm not trying to brag, my point is that it happens because I'm not afraid to reach out and actually try interacting with people. You can't just come and expect people to come to you, you have to actually be willing to engage.

Fedi is an interactive experience and it works better when you treat it as such, instead of just a window into someone else's thoughts.

the future of the web, Google Chrome 

During this other backlash which also has very
serious and important implications both for the web specifically and general-purpose computing at large, don't forget that the Google employees who are spearheading this assault on our freedom have names and addresses.

Question about homeserver : is there actually anywhere in the spec that defines *exactly* what the expected behaviour is when some of the events in prev_events are not known to you and you want to do stateres?

I've been searching for an hour and for the life of me I can't find it.

(To be clear, I'm talking about an exact process description, not an inference of what the spec "probably" means.)

@aral As predicted:
github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-

✔️ Within 3 days at most, there'll be a statement expressing their surprise how this proposal was received

✔️ They will regret that they were not able to "express" their "intentions" more "clearly", to avoid "misunderstandings"

✔️ That specific repo will be locked. Comments on that statement won't be permitted

ToDo: Within 3-6 months, this attempt will resurface, probably under a different name, and certainly on a different platform

#Google #Lies

Torment Nexus is committed to innovation and bringing new experiences.

Unlike some of the tech giants out there, we opt to omit such redundant things as soliciting public feedback or publishing standards when it comes to our innovations. They could learn from us.

CSAM meta 

Begging for people wanting to do "CSAM research" or other such high-profile things, to first *talk to an established CSA prevention organization* before doing the thing. Yes, this also applies to academics.

It's an incredibly complex topic, far more complex than it seems at first glance, and it's incredibly easy to make things *worse* for abuse victims rather than better, without realizing it.

If it helps, think of it as the equivalent of cryptography: don't roll your own research until you have become deeply familiar with the field and have feedback from peers.

I have a new hashtag proposal: #AskMeAbout

To participate in the hashtag, simply make a post listing 3-5 topics that you know a lot about and would feel comfortable discussing with other folks. Be sure to include the #AskMeAbout hashtag in your post!

Then, folks browsing the hashtag can hop on your post with their questions!

Just remembered my all-time favourite bug, where Android accidentally rendered the name of the "Grunt" tool on its webpage as "Dorkq" github.com/gruntjs/gruntjs.com

Still amazed by Finnair's apparent obsession with blueberry juice - not only do they (an airline!) have their own brand of blueberry juice, which I think you can even buy in supermarkets, they've also apparently made it a central feature of some custom-built logistics game that you can play on their in-flight WiFi

How any of this happened, I have no idea

health, negative 

Well, with how my kidney medication is going, I don't think a last-minute ticket for CCCamp is in the cards for me :(

It's nothing particularly serious, but I'm definitely gonna have to dial in my medication again, and that's not something I can really do cross-border at a campsite...

So we're all clear, "carbon offsets" and "carbon capture" just mean "pretending the problem doesn't exist" and "hoping somebody invents something magic someday"

Carbon capture is when you chase oil execs around with an oversized net.

While it’s easy to laugh at their incompetence, please don’t forget that fascists have always been incompetent. And yet, as history has shown time and time again, this in no way means they’re not dangerous or that they cannot cause widespread pain and suffering.

#x #ElonMusk #twitter

calckey/firefish meta 

It's a good thing that the Firefish folks have recognized their error, but I also can't help but observe that "we didn't notice they were nazis, and didn't actively check" conveys a certain... privilege

Like, there are rather a lot of people who cannot afford *not* to check, and allyship is about recognizing that others are bearing that sort of burden, and voluntarily taking over some of it

So if you're not in a habit of checking for nazis, and you wish to be an ally, well, then maybe you should *start* having that habit

Babe, wake up. OpenOffice hasn't received an update since 2011. It's time to let go

"if you're not anti-fascist, what are you?"
Fribourg, Switzerland

mastodon.art meta 

Further investigation of the allegations against mastodon.art yields:
- No receipts, evidence, or concrete details, not in any subthreads or side threads either that I can see
- Lots of evasive answers about exactly what is being alleged
- Two people agreeing that mastodon.art is in the wrong
- One of which signed up to the UfoI (the no-defederation pact)
- The other of which operates an instance that's well-known for originating harassment

So, uh, yeah, I think I'm gonna call this one 'case closed'.

No individual wants to hear how their beliefs/attitude originate from their privilege, generally getting angry that you're "generalizing"

... even when those beliefs and that privilege have an almost perfect correlation when observing "people" in general, and by definition the person with the privilege won't have this perspective to draw from, because to them those beliefs just look universal and "normal" (again, because of their privilege)

And I have no idea how to even begin addressing this

My fellow tech people: We should start calling wherever we keep bugs "The Book of Grudges". No more "filing a bug report."

FETCH ME THE BOOK OF GRUDGES.

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.