re: Matrix frustrations
Frustratingly, this is also the problem that is the least possible to fix without breaking backwards compatibility
Matrix frustrations
Probably my biggest frustration with the Matrix API design is that instead of specifying a couple of generalized communication primitives, it always reinvents stuff like pagination and transactions 3 times in different incompatible ways for different endpoints, and now every endpoint needs a subtly different implementation with its own bugs instead of one implementation for all of it
For most of my life, when I found something like this, I assumed that it was an Anomaly.
I would think to myself: Surely no other organization has flaws this fundamental being papered over by human labor.
But I spent the last five years jumping from Fundamental Flaw to Fundamental Flaw at a 20+ Billion dollar company, filling gaps like this while "automation" was built.
In *every* case, the automation solves ~95 or so percent of the problem, and leaves a rare but possible set of circumstances that will require a human to clean up.
In most cases so far, the only humans with the experience to clean things up have left, have been pushed out, or will leave soon.
And things will bubble up. And things will break. And 10+ engineers will have to waste 3 - 5 days investigating the problem, because every corporation is built on the backs of the knowledge of employees they do not value.
You know how there's a bunch of critical infrastructure powering the internet (and presumably a lot more than the internet) is badly maintained and underfunded (often by just a few people)?
We know about several examples in the open source world, but I'm sure we all also know about several examples in each of our personal lives, in each of our places of business.
And it's like that *everywhere*
I've rarely seen any organization that wasn't chewing gum and balling wire all the way down.
For Pride Month this year, the corporate PR offices are getting their banners ready!
#pride #csd #pridemonth #lgbtq #lgbt #queer #capitalism #pinkwashing
Is there a way to block everyone from a specific instance from seeing my posts without it also blocking the people from that instance I follow or who follow me?
bluesky made a moderation decision!
the CEO, Jay (below), claimed the post from the English Nationalist threatening to push a black woman off a roof was "metaphorical"
they didn't ban the nazi (the devs are following her, and the CEO was following her until everyone called her out on it)
they did make a new rule that the post would have been against
they didn't act against the account
the new rules also appear to ban doxxing nazis or advocating punching nazis. i wonder* how those will be interpreted.
and in conclusion, the purpose of a system is what it does
The irony that the admin of an instance that's done the rounds on fediblock twice, once for hosting transmisia and once for hosting a far right news outlet, is attending RightsCon
copyright bullshit
This is a fascinating read: https://torrentfreak.com/nintendos-war-with-1fichier-is-not-over-but-could-be-for-0-00-230419/
It occurs to me that the court's argument of "it's Nintendo, everybody knows Nintendo, therefore the infringement should be obvious" feels like it runs afoul of certain "everybody is equal under the law" rules that, if I'm not mistaken, are a hard requirement for EU membership...
Finding someone's list of favorite $thing on their personal gemini capsule/blog/website/whatever is like crack to me. Games, books, movies, software, whatever it is I love seeing the lists of things someone likes enough to make a list on their space on the net. A lot of the coolest things I've found on the internet were discovered that way.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.