NFTs, how to deal with the astroturfing?
There's a recurring theme with established people/orgs buying into NFT nonsense; where the actual customers/fans/etc. very quickly respond with universal disgust and criticism...
... but then over the next few weeks, once it's no longer news anymore, all the NFT shills and 'investors' (who generally have nothing to do with the org in question) start showing up and drowning the comments in positive encouragements and celebration.
And then for anyone reading back the public response later, it'll seem like the announcement was a great success that was very well-received, because of the sheer volume of astroturfed positive comments.
How would one deal with this effectively? I feel like it's creating a lot of misleading belief in the success of NFTs; both for onlookers, and for the organizations themselves.
message for cis people about the trans genocide
hey cis people
shit's really ramping up with this whole trans genocide
you're gonna start seeing a lot of posts where trans people are trying to crowdfund an escape from one of the places where they're actively being genocided
if you're wondering what can you do to materially help trans people survive the arriving shitstorm... BOOST THESE POSTS
your boost could be the one that makes a difference and puts it in front of the right person to donate
- Edit:
Here it is, thanks to
@molly0xfff : https://incidentdatabase.ai/
- Original question:
Do we have something like "Web3 is going just great" but for A.I.?
If you don't know the project:
@web3isgreat
https://web3isgoinggreat.com/
@requiem It's vastly disappointing how many people (including here) misunderstand both the problems associated with AI and the capabilities of AI in of itself.
* The current capabilities of AI are over-hyped and over estimated. It's fancy pattern recognition. It is by no means intelligent.
* Corporations are abusing it to steal code, art, and thus get rid of jobs.
* AI output is error prone, and always worse than what a skilled human would produce, but bad quality has never stopped a corporation from cheaping out in order to profit.
It is a multiplier in the race to the bottom. Artists, writers, etc,... are all getting massively screwed by having derivatives of their work stolen while at the same time job offers for the more simpler tasks vanish. As if creative people needed another kick while down. And their customers are being screwed by getting worse products in the end.
We're not "scared" of AI because we think it might go skynet on us. It ain't that clever. It's problematic because it gives corporations another way to exploit us. On a massive scale.
And sorry, but "Should have reviewed the code" is a lame excuse. We all know it's harder and slower to properly and thoroughly review code than to write it from scratch, especially for the trivial stuff AI would be used for at this time.
By using AI you're feeding more data to the companies running them which they can assimilate into their models. By using the tools you are accelerating the problem and actively making the world worse.
There is just no reason and no excuse to use AI. Just don't.
This from @mmasnick is so spot on:
“your reputation when you refuse to moderate is not ‘the grand enabler of free speech.’ Because it’s the internet itself that is the grand enabler of free speech. When you’re a private centralized company and you don’t deal with hateful content on your site, you’re the Nazi bar.”
I sort of want to shake people who are excited for LLMs because they might be able to synthesize information one day and be like "the reason that it's so hard to synthesize information now is because the exact same companies profit from the strategic disorganization of information by selling it back to us as search, analytics, dashboards, and platforms, and LLMs are the logical conclusion of that exact pattern."
I think this may be the best explanation of how Mastodon works that I've seen in my 5 months of being here.
https://mattbrown.dev/mastodon/
How terribly sad it is when someone on one of the bigger instances *cough mastodon.social cough* is the target of trolling and bigoted harassment and that's their take-away experience of the fediverse :(
Fuck 'official mastodon', making it harder for actual genuine safe space communities to convey that actually fedi can be lovely and you don't need to be on an instance that doesn't take care of its community.
covid and events
I don't want you to have a Covid policy. I want you to have an infectious diseases policy. I want you to take seriously the risk of spreading norovirus, mono, flu and measles at your event. The timeline is not split into "before Covid, when things were safe" and "with Covid, when things are deadly". You just weren't aware of the disease risk of large gatherings before now. None of the diseases are going away. Account for more than Covid.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.