@silvermoon82 I feel like this elides the much more important question: why do we need this? Why aren't we instead building better (technical and social) structures for the experts we *already have* and who *already* want to help others, to provide that kind of assistance?
@raito It doesn't, though; unless there is a way for people to live without a job, all it will do is artificially increase competition for the same jobs, putting human workers into a worse negotiating position (= worse pay, worse work environment).
Military drones don't move the losses to artificial 'humans' either; the casualties on the other end are still just as human, and the scale of them increases as automation is applied.
@virtulis But we already *have* less squishy and less biased systems; computers can do that just fine, given careful application.
So why do we need "AI"?
Especially considering that trying to recreate sentience is more likely to *reintroduce* bias, because biases, however frustrating, do actually play a role in survival and development.
@raito This seems like it just circles back to "labour exploitation" again, honestly.
How is Mozilla doing you ask? Firefox VCS has completed the move from their own infra to checks notes oh yeah, GitHub dot com
@raito The thing is, I don't see why point 1 would be in any way desirable, and point 2 doesn't seem to be what people actually are doing - instead they're trying to 1:1 emulate how human brains work, warts and all.
@eloy @linus This feels like the logical next step after they were planning to move away from IRC, and "Discord" was a serious candidate in the running...
The rationale back then was something along the lines of "running our own comms is not our core business and we just want something that requires no effort to keep running" and that was pretty much already the point where Mozilla was dead to me, because clearly they were unwilling to build the kind of world they claimed to want to see.
I might expect that kind of answer from a tech corporation. It has no place in an organization that ostensibly exists for activist purposes.
Serious question: why would we want to create artificial intelligence?
And I mean the actual meaning of the term, not "a bunch of algorithms in a trenchcoat" and *definitely* not LLM grifts, but something that you could plausibly consider a form of genuine sentient life.
Why is this even a goal worth chasing? What does anyone hope to actually achieve with this?
@z This looks a lot closer than most, thanks! From a quick look it's a bit too restricted for what I'm looking for (being tiling-only) but it's definitely quite close to the category I'm looking for.
on not hitting on fans (1/2)
Yesterday after I performed, maybe I had less of a reaction than I secretly had hoped for. I guess my previous piece was energetic, defiant, a battle-call when people are scared and need the idea of fighting back; so always brought great responses, with multiple people coming compliment me afterwards, asking where to read more... While this one is about genocide so of course it cannot be boastful, because how do you cope with the weight of the existence of genocide. "Sombre" doesn't begin to describe its mood. I get the sense that people wanted to move emotionally away from it after I finished and yeah, that is in itself a type of success, if I did my job correctly they *should*.
But there was this one cute girl who came tell me that my piece was important to her and it touched her and made her cry, and she didn't have the words to put it but I got it, I got that she got it. And she was looking at me with so much yearning and admiration that it felt basically heartless of me to not give her my socials on the spot, knowing that inevitably she'd give me her number, and I would ask her if she always comes to these events and does she write too and oh I love your style that's such a cool outfit... You know? I mean I may be wrong here, it's easy to misread signals when you're tripping on recent luck in love and feeling like a sex goddess, but I doubt it, the silences in that conversation were too expectant, she was waiting for something from me.
Only she wasn't actually crushing on me, not really. Maybe she had thought so, she was looking up in the direction of my face a lot, but what she was really looking at was Art.
I don't remember talking before with a fan. I mean with people who follow my mastodon posts yeah all the time, I mean my masto behaviour is basically that of a rockstar with groupies, but it's different, it's not like my toots are art meant to touch the soul it's just a spontaneous diary, my flirty mutuals aren't really fans in the proper sense, it's just people who think I'm hot. I joke about being a fediverse influencer but the parasocials here are a pastiche, I get like, 3-10 likes per post and my selfies are low-effort cellphone photos, so there's a good sense of realness when you meet fediverse ppl, they know I'm just some girl. But talking with that girl from the audience, having this contradictory feeling that she's waiting for something from me, and that it would be wrong of me to respond to that... I got it then, the problem with parasocial. It's not so much that her consent would be invalid because of power imbalances—that was a tiny poetry meetup by and for queers, half the audience were the poets themselves the other half their personal friends, it's not like I'm rich or famous or will ever be—but it's more like, seducing that girl in that situation would be like impersonation. Dating under false pretenses. Whatever she was longing for with those big wet eyes wide-open with amazement, she wouldn't find it in me. I'm mundane, I lurk on the sofa reading comic books, her longing was for the transcendent we experienced together as performer and audience, and it's not like I can connect her to that at will. I'm as amazed as her at the power of those words, the words are not me and they don't feel "mine" in any way that matters, they have their own spirit, I just know how to let it manifest in a way that resonates, how to be a medium. On a good day. Once every eleven months.
There's a part of my introduction for this piece where I make a joke like, "after all, what was poetry invented for if not to seduce lesbians? right??" which did manage to get a few chuckles from the audience. It's a reference of course to the OG from Lesbos, but this joke was part of a running shtick where I'm performatically trying, and repeatedly failing, to compose a poem about light-hearted, fun, sexy themes, until I'm compelled despite myself to write instead on the topic of the Shoah.
But now I come back to that joke, to the idea of seducing someone with art. I mean it's one thing to woo them with a guitar and a love song or something, but like, art from the very wellspring of being, type of art. What a dangerous thing that would be. How much like getting someone drugged. Or, more accurately, in a cult.
@ckie That's still definitely in the "rolling your own" camp. I'm more looking for something that's firmly outside of the "For Software Developers" category.
anyway so bluesky continue not to fix this nonsense so i am going to keep abusing it until someone does something about it
Abusive relationship, Sexist language
If he's ever called one of his ex's a "crazy bitch", do not have sex with him. Do not have children with him.
Do not move in with him.
Do. Not. Have. Sex. With. Him.
Ghost him immediately and don't walk home alone at night for the next few months.
He's not safe and he doesn't respect women. He's dangerous. Treat him as such.
Also I've met a lot of people who are like
Surprised and delighted or sometimes alarmed when I do this
Like their only experience of friendship is through the lens of trying to meet the expectations put on them, live up to standards that they have to guess at
People who apologize for liking things that they expect I won't think are cool
People apologize a lot for being themselves, especially trans people
Our survival can depend on meeting other people's expectations
Hey y'all I'm gonna strongly recommend that when you date or make friends with someone that you uh
Listen to them, watch them, learn who they are and take joy in that process
I see so many people trying to find someone who matches their idea of who they want to date, and then learn a little bit and make up the rest
And when it turns out that the rest of their partner doesn't match the made up person, they get scared or angry or resentful
I love learning new things about a person??
Do that
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.