Happy to announce that I've found a new IT assignment. Unironically, it happened via LinkedFUCKINGIn.
LMFAO!!!!
Blogged 👇
Anyone got access to the PDF for https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450119666171129165427 ? #ICanHazPDF
(Got it, thanks everyone!)
@luna I think it's valid to examine how this is disproportionally to the benefit of corporations and governments. They'll make sure we have memory safe DRM, memory safe back doors, and memory-safe regressive laws; and we'll keep getting hit by memory safe ad-network attacks, memory safe social engineering, and memory safe bulk data selling.
I don't want to live in the fully automated memory safe global crapitalism police state.
This is not exactly news, but I should maybe say it explicitly: I do not have any remaining faith in the #NixOS project pulling itself back together governance-wise.
There's been a consistent lack of urgency in addressing the increasing mountain of governance crises, some of them created by core developers(!), and that tells me that any formal solutions will *at best* be implemented reluctantly.
Any actual meaningful positive change is going to come from things organized outside of the formal structures in the project, like forks and specialist groups.
Nix 🤡 fork
The “not-a-fork”[sic] fork of Nix has decided to go ahead and take over the next major version number out of the hands from the official Nix package, and from there, take over the mindshare of the version 3.0.
What the actual fuck?
This is effectively a hostile takeover of the Nix name. Nix 3.0 will surface the “not-a-fork”[sic] fork.
They will surely be using the excuse that it's “Determinate Nix”, which is a different name. But in practice, you know how it is. They are polluting the mindshare with their “not-a-fork”[sic] fork.
Also, this is absolutely 100% a fork, even though they say it's not.
This is a fork that has made the current state of Flakes stable. A major fork in the road. Either Nix will have to become "incompatible" with the stability “promises” from the “not-a-fork”[fork], or bow down to what Determinate Systems decides for compatibility, for their future.
I guess it's a good time to jump over to Lix, for anyone who hasn't done so. It work just fine with NixOS.
Hopefully we'll have a statement from the Nix project regarding this.
CW-boost: uspol, resistance, actionable
Hoi Den Haag, hoi Burgemeester van Zanen,
Leg eens uit waarom XR niet mag, maar NATO wel?
https://nos.nl/artikel/2558379-belangrijke-verkeersader-den-haag-vier-maanden-dicht-om-navo-top
@hazelnot (Which wouldn't be a problem if someone just doesn't involve themselves in subjects they don't have experience with, but that's incompatible with being the BDFL of really anything)
@hazelnot Gargron often has good takes.
The problem is the same as with privilege in general. The takes are good as long as someone can relate it to their own situation, but they don't recognize when they're out of their depth or failing to account for something, and so things can go bad real fast once the subject crosses into a domain they don't have experience with.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.