re: about the Factorio thing, probably a spicy take to some
@clarfonthey That is another thing that has been irking me as well, but I just don't know enough about Wube's internal structure to make any definitive conclusions about that, hence why I've kept my comments to the cultural conflict aspect (as there are some pretty well-documented cultural differences between North-American and the region where Wube is that could be relevant here).
@Crazypedia I haven't used it personally, but their marketing is setting off every kind of red flag for me, they seem to be marketing to the "both sides" crowd, ie. the "good journalism is journalism that does no investigation and just describes claims" view from nowhere. I've avoided them for this reason.
(To that crowd, "bias" often just means "actually making ethical statements rather than just treating every possible outcome as fundamentally equal")
clarification, re: about the Factorio thing, probably a spicy take to some
For clarity, most of these comments I'm talking about weren't actually directly *on* fedi, but rather linked from here.
about the Factorio thing, probably a spicy take to some
Not a subtoot of anyone directly here, but since it's coming up again, and some of the claims I've seen are getting rather bizarre: yes, the guy is probably a bigot, yes, I wouldn't trust him either, but do please remember that not everyone lives in the US and different places have different cultures.
This doesn't *excuse* bigotry, obviously, but it is vitally important to understand the cultural background of someone to fully understand the context or perspective from which a comment is made, and some of the comments I've seen on the topic seem to be assuming that everyone is somehow magically aware of (and shares) the cultural context and norms of the US.
(And it's worth asking yourself whether making that kind of assumption is not just another aspect of cultural imperialism...)
As a sidenote, this is why I don't engage on discussions about "but people need a way to make a living!" if the speaker isn't willing to acknowledge that that can also very quickly become a problem if you're not super careful about how you implement it.
Like, we've tried just implementing "letting people make a living" directly. That's how we got Bitcoin.
CW-boost: climate disaster
@awoo I vaguely recall some vendors doing weird shit with their Android builds where the network connectivity is misdetected by anything other than their own phone UI because it's internally tagged as another thing, so this one *might* not actually be KDE's fault (though I don't remember which vendors did this exactly)
I discovered a great new language learning platform yesterday. One of its key workflows presents content in a dialog, and it works great with NVDA. When the dialog opens in Safari on iOS, though, VoiceOver decides that the entire screen is blank.
I'm so tired of #accessibility workarounds being needed for everything in life. Trying to apply my mental energy to something useful and interesting, only to end up spending it on the same old shit is exhausting.
tangent, re: bluesky
@eniko @igimenezblb Thinking about it a bit more, that's already kind of implied in the 'learned' part of 'learned helplessness' so I'm not really sure now where this apparently widespread belief of it being 'human nature' comes from 🤔
re: bluesky
@eniko @igimenezblb I don't think that's some kind of fundamental human nature though, rather a result of the experience people have had through their lives (which, let's be real, haven't exactly featured particularly much agency over the shape of their own lives)
serious answer
@q A big deal is made about them mostly because of the governance issues surrounding their introduction, but while their design does imply a lot of internal changes in Nix, flakes *themselves* are a fairly simple concept:
They're like a sort of package.json for chunks of Nix code. A manifest with a standard-ish structure for exporting different kinds of things in predefined ways, where you can make certain assumptions about it, so that you can build a bigger whole on top of it.
That's really all it is. Everything else is internals changes to make this actually work in practice, but this is the fundamental problem it's meant to solve, a standardized declarative way to export and reuse piles of Nix without having to centrally manage everything in one repo or deal with 5 slightly different sets of import/update semantics.
re: challenging protocol design problem, mathematical?, help wanted
@virtulis The 'not converging' is a problem there, unfortunately - the authorization process is emergent from the state convergence, and so different parties would have a different view of authorization rules.
@tante This is exactly the same thing I've noticed as well (this phenomenon has pretty much taken over the JS world since the startups rolled in during a hype cycle), but frustratingly we now seem to be looping back to "don't use other people's code ever" instead of people actually critically asking themselves whether maybe it's the *type* of dependency that's the problem 🙁
re: challenging protocol design problem, mathematical?, help wanted
@virtulis (I'm still looking into your suggestions, by the way, it just takes a while to absorb all of this properly)
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.