@ianwalker (I do plan on working with polling companies at some point in the future for activism reasons, hence my interest in the oddities of the process!)
@ianwalker I have not! Hence my curiosity :)
@ianwalker Ah yeah, if it got intermixed with other questions, then it wouldn't be such an issue. Curious how you decided on per-set randomization and not per-question randomization, though - was there a specific reason for that?
We have a new study out!
The short version is this: "Car Brain" - the cultural blind spot that makes people apply double standards when they think about driving - is real, measurable and pervasive.
Read on for more details... 1/14 @SwanseaUni@twitter.com @UWEBristol@twitter.com @EdNapierTRI@twitter.com
@ianwalker If I'm understanding correctly, everybody got either 5 driving questions or 5 non-driving questions, and the randomization between 'driving' and 'non-driving' was on a per-set basis and not a per-question basis?
That seems to me like it could skew the results - 5 driving questions would be obviously related, whereas 5 non-driving questions would not be, which could change the answering patterns of the "driving" respondents and might eg. make them respond more defensively.
(I'm not sure whether this would really affect the conclusion, though.)
grumbling, activism
If you feel that radical folks are "too radical" and "scaring off others", but "you agree with them in principle", why aren't you volunteering to do the job of explaining this to liberals/centrists/etc.?
Why are you instead demanding that the radical folks moderate their speech, look friendly, and generally shut up about the incredibly taxing and frustrating experience of constantly getting the same milquetoast subtly-bigoted shit thrown at them masquerading as progressive politics?
Why are you expecting the people who are *already* bearing the brunt of abuse and doing most of the work for social change, to do *even more* work to look less scary and more appealing? Why aren't *you* the one doing that?
Just saw Servo is getting full time developers again in 2023! https://servo.org/blog/2023/01/16/servo-2023/
Servo is the "write a browser in Rust" project Mozilla started in 2012 (and which created the whole Rust language as part of the work) - they stopped working on it a few years ago
The new development looks like it's backed by Igalia - "a private, worker-owned, employee-run cooperative model consultancy focused on open source software" based in Spain: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igalia
More: https://people.igalia.com/mrego/servo/igalia-servo-tsc-2022/
I really don't understand why people think it/its is degrading. Why are you thinking of lesser things for it/its when the pronouns could represent towering mountains, harmonious sounds, powerful torrents and the limitless sky?
It /is/ dehumanizing, which is not a bad thing. I feel closer to the songbird and the volcano and the cassava plant and the stars. If your choice of thing to think about when you use it/its for me is degrading, then you have made the choice of thinking less of me because of it.
If you are cis and are talking about transphobia, you must use a CW (or else you're an asshole).
Otherwise, I would like to please encourage the use of CWs for these topics in these trying times to avoid traumatising your trans siblings. Thank you.
re: peertube github
@scanlime IPFS proponents are extremely irritating. I've seen them derail more than one project by proposing completely hopeless IPFS-based implementations (without mentioning the poor availability characteristics, of course).
why on earth do academics care so much about students cheating with #ChatGPT and don't seem to mind the emergence of a new kind of platform economy that further abstracts labor in a series of services that just barely work enough to fool VCs, laundering liability for products through "of course the chatbot is imperfect," and a new set of chokepoints for tech companies to serve as obligate passage points for data harvesting? Some of them even seem excited for it magically solving the problems left by our dereliction of responsibility for maintaining our own infrastructure like informational synthesis, search, and discovery.
oh wait no that tracks.
All I'm gonna say is that everyone saying we need to do "prefigurative politics" to make some kind of "better world" but who refuses to even engage with the existence of children and teens? And somehow aren't questioning the existence of schools?
It'd be great if they'd either help those of us wanting to build healthier SDE/unschooling communities and make them accessible or shut up forever, lmao.
in reading a little while writing this, people are marketing “opt-out consent” as a type of consent lmao
as if taking your info/data/whatever doesnt require consent to do, and they Will do it without your consent and only stop when you say so.
sounds exactly like the opposite of consent
again. techbros do Not understand consent and you will not convince me otherwise
We support the blockade of the Davos private airport by @DebtforClimate, demanding debt cancellation for the Global South. Thousands of private jets are using this airport to attend the World Economic Forum, where financial decisions strangling the Global South are made.#wef23 1/
---
RT @DebtforClimate
BREAKING: We are blocking the private airport used by #Davos23 attendees to demand the richest 1% pay their climate debt!
#DebtforC…
https://twitter.com/DebtforClimate/status/1614893553955528704
@whatanerd I don't know how this is in other countries, but in eg. NL, the legal requirements on institutionalized schooling are so extreme that you have to be *extremely* motivated to even try unschooling, and so that results in the usual suspects actually doing so
@Kye@tech.lgbt @ivory Not necessarily, it depends. EEE is always a serious threat with particularly for-profit enterprises that have some sort of sway in public discourse.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.