We have a new study out!
The short version is this: "Car Brain" - the cultural blind spot that makes people apply double standards when they think about driving - is real, measurable and pervasive.
Read on for more details... 1/14 @SwanseaUni@twitter.com @UWEBristol@twitter.com @EdNapierTRI@twitter.com
@ianwalker If I'm understanding correctly, everybody got either 5 driving questions or 5 non-driving questions, and the randomization between 'driving' and 'non-driving' was on a per-set basis and not a per-question basis?
That seems to me like it could skew the results - 5 driving questions would be obviously related, whereas 5 non-driving questions would not be, which could change the answering patterns of the "driving" respondents and might eg. make them respond more defensively.
(I'm not sure whether this would really affect the conclusion, though.)
@ianwalker Ah yeah, if it got intermixed with other questions, then it wouldn't be such an issue. Curious how you decided on per-set randomization and not per-question randomization, though - was there a specific reason for that?
@ianwalker I have not! Hence my curiosity :)
@ianwalker (I do plan on working with polling companies at some point in the future for activism reasons, hence my interest in the oddities of the process!)
@joepie91 Have you TRIED working with polling companies? ;)