@patcharcana@furry.engineer Hmm, not sure what you mean with third-party DNS issues? Every VPS provider I've ever used pretty much *expects* you to use DNS services from elsewhere.
(I'm quite happy with various providers including Afterburst and PHP-Friends, though neither are the cheapest *possible* providers, for that you should probably have a look at LowEndSpirit)
@doot@glitterkitten.co.uk @zkat That's the most important part IMO, loudly maintaining the culture of it being unacceptable, and not letting the "but it's inevitable anyway, that's the way of progress" crowd take over the narrative.
That way there will still *be* people to work on more effective defenses if and when they become necessary.
I often say that election security is by far the hardest technical problem I've ever encountered. Why? Four reasons:
1) Contradictory critical requirements, particularly vote secrecy vs. transparency.
2) No truly neutral trusted third parties.
3) Election do-overs are generally impossible, so the ability to merely detect problems is insufficient. You have to reliably prevent them.
4) Much of the technology than can manage the complexity of elections is inherently untrustworthy.
I'm also equally exhausted from the people who write about school "abolition" and somehow still think we need silos for kids, teens, and young adults and to segregate learning from living.
Or the academic anarchists who "focus on pedagogy" and somehow still think their positions as academics should exist. That's also fun.
@doot@glitterkitten.co.uk @mark Wait, which one is today's one?
The Gas Industry Is Paying Instagram Influencers to Gush Over Gas Stoves
https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2020/06/gas-industry-influencers-stoves/
@zens@merveilles.town That depends heavily on what you mean with "natural". Obviously, "do nothing and let nature sort itself out" isn't gonna be a solution, but that doesn't automatically mean that mechanisms like algae cannot be sufficient when deliberately/strategically applied.
Assuming that we must need to invent some futuristic technology (which does not exist yet and therefore we cannot actually apply today) is, to me, just the other end of the "appeal to nature" fallacy.
Maybe the answer *does* turn out to be that algae (and other "natural" forms of carbon capture) cannot be sufficient. But that should be verified and supported with evidence/numbers, not just assumed and preemptively excluded as an option!
Otherwise we'll just end up doing nothing and waiting for some hypothetical future technology to arrive (that maybe never will), all the while the problem gets worse.
@zens@merveilles.town Honestly, I suspect that the reason is more depressing than that; it just isn't shiny enough for the "climate techbros" who love to talk about futuristic carbon capture technology (that does not currently exist), and it isn't "grandfathered" into the conversation like trees are either.
One of these days I will analyze #OpenStreetMap data to see if there really are a lack of houses with a house number of 13.
update: Searchtodon meta, scraping related
Since then multiple others have mentioned these concerns to him, but they're dismissed just the same.
Yet again a recently joined twitter techbro is writing a scraper, but this time it's couched in language about "consent" and "privacy", it's still effectively building a centralized search index across users on his single server. Opt-out is also not actually consent, both legally (GDPR) and morally.
He keeps dismissing it as just a non-ideal stopgap-solution but that doesn't matter. it's about what's happening right now. random users logging in thinking there's *anything* private about this service, and feeding their entire following to the machine
@tobi Also note how they're usually the same people who are very insistent that *absolutely everybody in the world* must be using Mastodon, absolute scalability brain
@tobi I mean, considering that that is literally how the whole startup industry works
meta, quote boosts
@Quinnae_Moon@wandering.shop @jdp23 Quite an informative article, thanks - that's clarified a few of the claims for me that I've heard thrown around but never fully understood.
One aspect I'm missing in that article, though: the distinction between toxicity as in "someone deliberately using it for toxic purposes" and toxicity as in "driving people towards ambient toxic interaction patterns without realizing it".
The article seems to only address the former (and makes good points as to why that's not a particularly big concern!), but my concern would be more with the latter - particularly when used by (white) folks who do not have an existing concept of "playing the dozens".
In that case, you very quickly end up at behaviour patterns along the lines of "QT someone with a snarky comment for personal clout", with none of the understanding or context of a call-and-response culture - driving focus towards clout-chasing rather than genuine conversation.
(Also the related problem of "QTing problematic toots to point them out just helps them spread, and so people start deliberately saying shitty things to get more exposure", which is the same problem but from the other side of the QT)
TL;DR: I don't think the problem is Black folks using the feature, as there's clearly a cultural context for it there to make it work. I'm worried about how it'd be used by other folks who *don't* have that context, and what kind of behaviour that drives on a fedi-wide scale.
I have no idea how to address this. I hope this comment even made any sense at all, as I'm not in the best brainspace right now...
@raboof @winduptoy But also, if a provider did this to me, I'd probably start looking to move.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.