re: meta, inherent power imbalance associated with technology
@forestjohnson I'm not sure I'd agree that we've ever actually reached that point with literacy either. Two things that immediately come to mind:
- Your writing implements are going to be manufactured by someone else, and very few people know how to manufacture writing implements that are equivalently practical/durable. And that practicality matters, because...
- Just because "everybody is literate" it doesn't mean that everybody is *equally* literate. Even if you ignore the practical factors like writing implement quality, in today's society there are *vast* differences between eg. people's ability to convincingly argue, their access to publishing, and so on.
I would say that there absolutely is still a significant power imbalance on matters of writing and literacy; the baseline is just high enough that it's less obvious.
meta, power imbalance, addendum
(This *should* go without saying, but none of this is meant to imply that fedi culture is perfect as it is, or that there aren't real eg. racism issues. It just means that those are social issues, not technical issues.)
meta, power imbalance
I think that what bothers me about the "there's a power imbalance between who can host an instance and who can't and that's why fedi is unsustainable" argument, is that it doesn't acknowledge that *this is true for every alternative too*.
This isn't a problem of Mastodon or fedi specifically. It is a problem of technology in general, a problem that even predates computers. It holds true for any infrastructure that involves technical complexity. Once it becomes a specialization, there's a power imbalance.
Even if you just look at social media sites - how is this any different for Twitter, Cohost, and so on? There's still the same admin vs. user power imbalance, just now you don't even get to choose who is the admin, and there's no real accountability because the cost of leaving is social exclusion.
I'm not convinced that this problem (of power imbalance in technical complexity) is actually solvable, and I also don't think that it's a useful *goal* to try and solve it - it feels to me like the same old 'rugged individualism' in a new coat of progressive-sounding paint.
The more useful goal here would be to *acknowledge* that those power imbalances exist, and try to erase or at least minimize their impact through building healthy communities and trust relationships. Not by replacing it with a centralized silo that has the same problems but worse.
(And no, P2P isn't a solution either. There's still a power imbalance between developer and user there.)
re: adhd meds, thoughts
@ardaxi @ShadowJonathan@tech.lgbt Similar here, and to add a data point: meds have helped me to get a better grip on how to deal with these issues *without* them
“venture capital funds innovation”
“You can find us anywhere you get your podcasts.”
I *adore* this phrase, because it has been like two whole-ass decades and not one single venture capital darling has managed to unseat plain RSS as the distribution method for podcasts. Not one. (And they have really tried!)
Podcasts are just out there, like air. You don’t go to one place to get them; you get them from everywhere and anywhere. You can choose how you want to engage with them and manage them and it is legitimately heartwarming that nothing has ever gotten in the way of that being a fundamental fact.
This is the best of what the web is. It will never have a stock ticker or even a marketing scheme. Most people don’t even know it is there. But it endures (past the many, many attempts by squillionaire corporates to kill it) because of its absolute unshakable utility.
My suggestion: any time you hear “anywhere you get your podcasts”, send a little thanks to RSS for keeping the real web alive.
@samgai I do not have enough entities for that
boostable version, donate to Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre, transmisia, fuck TERFs
Today, scottish Arch-TERF JK Rowling announced she's funded a competing rape crisis centre in Edinburgh that will only serve cis women, apparently as a fuck-you to the existing Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre, which has a trans woc CEO and has endured months of harrassment from TERFs to the point of temporary closure. Please show some support to the current trans-inclusive ERCC if you can:
@StroomAfwaarts @AtelierCreaRose (Een van die onderzoeken was nota bene op een Nederlandse school!)
@StroomAfwaarts @AtelierCreaRose Natuurlijk niet. De natuurwetten gelden niet in Nederland, dus we moeten alles eindeloos zelf nameten.
Hier een samenvatting van bestaand onderzoek: https://operame.nl/Ventileren_voor_betere_leerprestaties
re: yet another meta
@cgranade Yeah, this is precisely what I was concerned about when I originally started warning people about this, the whole-system effects that you can't defederate away :/
I guess the positive aspect is that I'd expected to get a lot of "what are you complaining about, just block them and call it a day" replies, but those didn't happen! So it seems that people at least pretty widely recognized the whole-system effects.
yet another meta
Like, try to offer shared codes of conduct or moderation guidelines, let alone volunteering moderation time, and you quickly land on the same land already poisoned by alt-right trolls. The actions that qoto and UOfI have taken substantially harm efforts to make a meaningful fediverse centered on personal agency and on community health.
yet another meta
Most of the problems of qoto and UOfI are trivially solved by blocking and/or defederating, as it's obvious that nothing good will result from explicitly institutionalizing bigotry in a cross-instance code of conduct.
What makes me especially sad, though, is that UOfI has pretty effectively taken the air out of the room for good-faith efforts at creating cross-instance resources for community support.
Your regular reminder that some men need abortions too, and leaving us out of the conversation as irrelevant only furthers the christofascist agenda we’re all fighting.
#abortionIsHealthcare #abortionIsAHumanRight #transmasc #transMan
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.