Show newer

politics-adjacent, infrastructure 

A (paraphrased) description by someone I know, of the "fallacy of the factory", which describes a serious risk of centralized manufacturing:

You build a factory to manufacture something that people need. That requires a big investment, that the factory now needs to make back in some way, but the legitimate need isn't big enough to do so.

So now the manufacturer starts inducing demand, by lobbying, advertising the product, whatever is necessary to make back that investment. Eventually the demand exceeds production capacity, and the factory needs to expand, again requiring significant investment - plus surrounding infrastructure *also* needs to expand.

This cycle repeats until your small "factory with a legitimate purpose" has turned into a self-serving sprawling system that keeps expanding unsustainably, regardless of what exact economic system it exists under.

re: meta, FediBlock, long :boost_requested:​ 

@Liberonscien Specifically calling out nudity/sexuality as requiring a CW *but nothing else* is a tell-tale sign of puritan politics, and it's the root of an awful lot of oppressive shit

re: meta, FediBlock, long :boost_requested:​ 

@ada Ah yeah, I can see how that might happen :)

re: meta, FediBlock, long :boost_requested:​ 

@ada Wait, are we looking at the same document? This is what I'm seeing:

"The following acts are strictly forbidden on all instances within the UFI: 1. Hate-based racism, sexism, and other hateful speech, but generally unpopular opinions voiced respectfully will be fine."

re: meta, FediBlock, long :boost_requested:​ 

@ada Thing is, that's obvious *to us*. But the whole "hate is banned, but critical questions are okay" is unfortunately a very effective dogwhistle to draw in naive centrists, who don't (want to) see the intentions behind "just asking questions" and such harassment tactics.

It could absolutely gain traction, when framed as the "reasonable compromise" approach. It very frequently does work in other contexts :/

meta, FediBlock (additional receipts) :boost_requested:​ 

So I've been told that the QOTO admin is also planning to sue Eugen over their removal from joinmastodon.org (presumably over the toot about the reason for their removal specifically). I do not have further context to confirm the details here, but here is the receipt.

Show thread

re: meta, FediBlock, long :boost_requested:​ 

@ada (That is, we're not the target demographic, the 'clueless centrists' are)

re: meta, FediBlock, long :boost_requested:​ 

@ada I suspect the play is to try and make defederation appear socially unacceptable, to a broader public which doesn't quite understand yet why it's a thing on here.

composite video is so funny like let’s do 480i 30fps video over one cable and then use two for audio just cuz

re: meta, FediBlock, long :boost_requested:​ 

@stevelord Oh, *on paper* anyone is welcome to contribute suggestions. In practice, I've talked to the guy, and he absolutely did not listen to a word I've said that didn't already fit into his preconceived notions and conclusions.

hellsite 

I'm starting to feel really skeeved out by companies, government services, and nonprofits that maintain Twitter presences but nothing on the fediverse. That means an endorsement of COVID denialism, white supremacy, transphobic violence, and other right-wing causes, all at an institutional level.

Hello I am going to repeat for the hundredth time that I used to love technology but now I spend more time complaining about technology.

the "danger of a filter bubble" is that you might, through tremendous effort, construct a useful, readable and enjoyable incoming flow without turds bobbling in it

this idea is strongly objected to by the turds

@baldur If I got a euro for every time I had to tell someone "{fedi,Matrix} is not a startup, there are literally only downsides to scaling fast"...

You’ll note that all of the discourse around Mastodon and Fediverse adoption now is about it “challenging” or “taking over” from Twitter.

This is yet another instance of pop culture taking over the discourse. Pop culture has to have a winner. It’s always a competition. Improvement or serving the end user is always secondary to winning out in a popularity contest.

Be extremely skeptical of any advice that is framed by the pop culture leaderboard. It’s likely to be toxic in the long run.

"The fediverse needs critical mass to survive!"

I've been here since 2017. Sometimes it's been a quiet place. Sometimes it's fast-paced. But it's had enough critical mass for survival for a long while.

Now what it needs it to become a _better_ place, not bigger.

Safer, nicer, friendlier, more welcoming to those at risk. A hasty push for more "critical mass" is likely to make these communities more aggressive, less forgiving, and less sustainable in the long term.

Show thread

The people in the neighborhood wanted a bridge over the creek. The city had no funding for #PedestrianInfrastructure for something like that. But they did get an #art grant, so they hired an artist to create an art installation that would span the creek that people could walk on. I frequently walk my dogs along this creek and yes, over the bridge sometimes.
dezeen.com/2021/08/06/drift-pe

Acid test for any social network or fedi instance:

If you say "fuck you" to a Nazi, who gets banned?

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.