@MxAlba Sowieso een onzin-eis wat mij betreft. Als het om 'synchroon lopen met overheidsgegevens' gaat dan vragen ze maar een uittreksel uit het bevolkingsregister op...
daughter: I'm trying not to overdo it but I find it very hard to feel guilty for missing classes. teacher is angry because I was late and I'm like, "I'm sorry that the park was so beautiful and I stopped to enjoy the rare sunlight and look at the plants starting to come up"?? I'm not sorry actually??
me: many of my most precious youth memories were skipping school, and I don't recall a single time I regret not going to class.
daughter: not helping lol
TIL about https://www.batteryholders.org/ — "the comprehensive battery holder and battery contact information center" — and it really does seem to be exactly that. Need dimensions for a weird battery, or details of how to mount it in your project. It's likely in there
LLMs, article link, someone's personal vent that contains slurs
@joepie91 Always a classic! Want mine? Rant on AI that is https://robertkingett.com/posts/6593/
So for @fluconf I'll need to host a video of my talk and the conf requested hosting it not on Youtube or other tracking platforms.
I kinda don't wanna just throw it on my webserver (because I don't know the load this might create). Anyone have any good experiences with specific Peertube instances or something else that's simple?
I have been accepted for a talk at #fluconf
My presentation is called "Improving Diversity and Inclusion in the Open Source Community" and you can see the presentation slides here:
1/3
*edit: gevonden!* Gisteren zag ik een bericht van een foto van twee katten bij een achterdeur. De achterste kat leek zó op mijn vroegere kat. Ik dacht vandaag: misschien toch even vragen of ze hem uit het asiel heeft? Ik kan het bericht niet terugvinden. Van een Nederlandse vrouw met rood haar en een hoed op.
meta, ableism, elaborating on my fediblock post
So I want to provide some elaboration on this fediblock post I made: https://blackqueer.life/@tillshadeisgone/113891510610086508
I want to remind you all of a selection from of my pinned post on conflict with comrades, which I believe is relevant here.
So, I have been rethinking how I interact with this space going forward to better protect myself but also to have a more robust and intentional framework for how to engage with conflicts. I've been learning about how revolutionaries in the past have handled conflict with each other while maintaining unity in their movement. Many of these practices existed within local orgs and communities, and therefore are not necessarily applicable or appropriate for a digital and public space like this. However, I think some lessons can still be taken. So, in light of that, HERE IS MY PROPOSAL: If I am engaging with you and I believe that while we are aligned in our goals for liberation, you are inadvertently causing harm with your words, I may ask you to self-crit. This is not an attack, but is an invitation to reconsider what you are saying. This will also mean that I am available to you, privately or publicly, to explain my thinking and have a dialogue about our disagreement.
This policy is what I was drawing on when I engaged with the user I made a fediblock post about. As mentioned in my fediblock post, I chose to reach out privately to mention my concern and be able to explain my thinking in the hopes that I would be heard. This was a couple of days ago.
The thing is, just as I mentioned in said pinned post that antiblackess destroys unity, ableism destroys unity too. Black disabled folks have been saying for YEARS on this and every other digital platform that they feel excluded from just about every single community space, on the left or otherwise. This is not new information by any means.
Therefore, ESPECIALLY given that as our server's About section points out, 1 in 4 Black American adults are disabled, it is my responsibility as the admin of BQL to make sure that our space does not reproduce that same dynamic. If I want Black disabled people to feel like they can be in our community, I cannot allow ableism in our community. Full stop.
As I feel like I keep repeating, this is something I take very seriously. And sometimes, despite my best efforts, attempts to convince people that they are doing harm are not going to be successful. That is what happened in this case. The person did not listen to me or anyone else who tried to convince her, including Black disabled people who were impacted by her words. She continued, over the course of the past two or three days, to double down, saying that racism is a mental illness. Then, she started defending using the R slur and blaming disabled people for Trump being elected, explicitly referencing alleged decreases in average IQ scores.
When someone is repeatedly insistent on echoing eugenics ideology and Nazi talking points about intelligence, that is several steps past what is acceptable. To steal some language I got from communists, the contradiction between her deeply held beliefs and the presence and value of my disabled users was clearly antagonistic and not resolvable through dialogue.
Sometimes, you have to do the hard thing. It wasn't pleasant, but guess what? That's the job. Do you think it was pleasant for me to suspend instances like tech.lgbt or aus.social where we had a lot of connections, cutting our users off from theirs? To make public posts about it before and after? No, it was extremely stressful and upsetting and brought a lot more harassment my way. But I did it anyway. Wasn't the first time, won't be the last.
Oh, and it is worth mentioning that I have been accused of catering to the "white political gaze" by making my fediblock post, implying that I am doing so for the optics and because I care about getting accolades from white people more than I care about my fellow Black folks. It has been implied that this is all theater, and has no connection to any real beliefs on my part. To that, all I can say is that ableism is a bigger danger to Black folks than white people. White supremacy is inextricably tied to ableism, and I have referenced and boosted multiple works by Black disabled advocates and academics in the past two days who discuss that exact concept. In short, disability justice is not just for fucking white people.
To close, I just want to restate that at the end of the day, ableism is a violation of rule #1 on BQL. Anyone who doesn't agree with the existence of that rule or who doesn't like it when we enforce it is no comrade of mine.
Thanks for reading.
Ik had dit als losse gedachte en nu wil ik het. Europese providers: mogen we opslag bij jullie en in-browser officepakketten? Dan krijgen jullie geld van me en zal ik het nooit meer hebben over dat gedoe met de datakabel in onze straat. Beloofd. https://mastodon.nl/@venite/113899795924795606
@sandradejong Benzine-tuingerei, op nauwe voet gevolgd door elektrisch (tuin)gereedschap, met name zagen en schuurmachines. Zeker als iemand urenlang bezig is en hem constant eventjes een minuut aanzet (i.p.v. voor te bereiden en alles tegelijk te doen), zodat je nooit rust hebt.
Daarnaast, gebonk dat door de muren komt, en 'stuiterend' meubilair dat rondgeschoven wordt en waar geen viltjes onder zitten.
Even if you think you’re the exception and you will never become chronically ill, wear a mask.
Even if you’re “young and otherwise healthy”, wear a mask.
Even if your last covid infection was “mild”, wear a mask.
Do it for those who may not be as lucky, and do it to protect your long term health
#covidisairborne #covidisnotover #longcovid #chronicillness #disability
rant
re: poisoning AI by disregarding disabled people
@Yza @clarfonthey I do not find that a credible idea. LLM companies are certainly aware of accessibility content, and that it is a good way to find relatively high-quality training data. They aren't just taking whatever content they come across without quality assessment.
And if you're relying on scraper traps anyway (assuming they work), then you don't need to pollute the accessibility information to begin with, and it is no longer relevant to the original post?
I don't think it's helpful to suggest vague solutions without concrete details on how it would work and avoid disaster, personally. It creates the appearance of there being solutions without actually solving any of the hard problems.
CW-boost: "AI"
re: poisoning AI by disregarding disabled people
@Yza @clarfonthey How would that even work, though? What stops an AI scraper from simply acting like an accessibility tool in its interpretation of the page?
poisoning AI by disregarding disabled people
just posting this on its own since it probably got lost already, as a comment on a different thread:
basically every method of "poisoning" AIs by messing with content in "unnoticeable" ways for all clients, will make your content less accessible.
trying to analyse network traffic and put AI scrapers into mazes is fine and won't affect most people. adding hidden text "off screen" has a very high chance of affecting screen readers and other accessibility aids, while not affecting AI scrapers.
one key example is where people have proposed to modify subtitles in videos to add lots of garbage that is "invisible" or "off screen", similar to the age-old trick of having white text in the background of a PDF that gets picked up by résumé scanners. the solution that all of these tools have chosen is to just render the document and OCR the text, meaning that the bad actors continue as usual, but the good actors get messed up as their screen reader lists out all sorts of nonsense, and everyone suffers as the scanners fail to properly OCR text that isn't perfect Times New Roman Eleven Point Font.
for videos, people have argued that blind people can listen to the unmodified audio track, whereas deaf people can read the subtitles which are only showing what's on the screen. this excludes deaf-blind people who are forced to read the transcript with a braille reader: they will get the nonsense you put in the subtitles. or, just anyone who wants to read the transcript for any other reason.
it really is admirable for people to try and "poison" AI data, but unless you do so in a way that is tailored to the clients doing the scraping (network traffic), you are going to just fuck over people who need your accessibility data. please don't
re: transphobia
@oddtail A lot, in my experience, especially privileged folks :(
I've lost count of how often I've had conversations where I pointed out that they have never apologized or even acknowledged wrongdoing, and especially privileged folks would accuse me of having unreasonable expectations because "they've clearly grown as a person"
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
Feel free to flirt, but if you want to actually meet up and/or do something with me, lewd or otherwise, please tell me explicitly or I won't realize :) I'm generally very open to that sort of thing!
Further boundaries: boosts are OK (including for lewd posts), DMs are open. But the devil doesn't need an advocate; I'm not interested in combative arguing in my mentions. I am however happy to explain things in-depth when asked non-combatively.
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.