Show newer

re: type of guy 

@hazelnot FWIW, you're nowhere near as bad on this as the people I'm thinking of here (and your responses often seem to be less personal/egocentric and more to do with generalized social frustrations).

It's a good habit to unlearn but this post definitely wasn't about you!

roses are sepia
violets are sepia
everything is sepia

someone is messing with the camera filters again

type of guy 

Interprets every single direct criticism of their views as a direct personal challenge and affront of their character... even when they weren't even the one being talked about

type of guy 

Absolutely refuses to consider the needs or experiences of someone who doesn't look like them, even if it wouldn't cost them anything to do so, and insists on being Objectively Correct solely because their claims align with their own experiences and beliefs

Most of us are struggling financially rn, it isn't your fault.

days since the ladybird browser was recommended by someone who clearly didn't pay attention: 0

*rots in its bed for the first 7 hours of its day, procrastinating on taking any medication*
"life only consists of eternal depression and there is no saving for such a pathetic broken being as me"

alina after the ADHD meds finally hit: nyoooooooom

@JimmyB @pezmico "or even a prevalent lack of agency, independence, and spaces for socialisation"

@mynameistillian I think you're spending a lot of spoons (involuntarily) on your shitty living situation right now, and I suspect that that's what's getting in the way of holding a job, more than college

@JimmyB @pezmico

"Why do you think I want kids to have no social contact???"

I said no such thing. I am asking specifically *where and how* you expect kids to socialize. That question remains unanswered here. Okay, "safe places" - *what* safe places? The whole point established in the original post was that there *are* no such places anymore.

@JimmyB @pezmico You "might" get stabbed anywhere at any time. And yet people go outside, they go to places where this is an elevated risk, even. Because yes, social contact is actually necessary, and that has a certain amount of risk.

If there are no social spaces for kids, and you take away their remaining venue for social contact (or never allow them to have it, doesn't matter), then where and how exactly do you expect kids to socialize?

@JimmyB @pezmico "Not giving kids access to them" and "taking them away" are functionally equivalent here. My original point stands.

@nick @researchfairy @derickr Ah yes, Safari, the browser which notoriously only runs on very expensive hardware that is completely inaccessible to a huge amount of people.

Definitely "the most viable option". Mhmm.

@JimmyB @pezmico The problem with this reasoning is that those very phones are often kids' only refuge from the other problems (like a lack of social spaces). So you mostly just end up taking away a coping mechanism instead of solving any problems.

I don't necessarily disagree that phones might be harmful for kids' development.

I just don't know if they're nearly as harmful as say, repeated covid infections, a collapsing biosphere, a justifiably bleak vision of their future, or even a prevalent lack of agency, independence, and spaces for socialisation.

I'd focus on those first. Then phones.

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.