@blakespot Hmm, is that an announcement of an upcoming update, or has it already been released?
(The GOG version still seems to be stuck on Adrift)
re: advice to independent software developers
@KuJoe (Bonus: a frankly shocking amount of 'custom hardware platforms' in large companies are essentially Raspberry Pis or equivalent boards in a trenchcoat, sometimes even repurposed consumer hardware)
advice to independent software developers
Speaking from many years of experience with software development, personally and professionally: There's really nothing special about the stuff that large tech companies do, actually.
In the vast majority of cases where it looks like they have some magical technology that's miles ahead of what's publicly known/available, in reality they're using the same commodity tools and techniques that you are using, they've just papered over the sharp edges with marketing / manual labour / UI design / etc.
Sure, they have more budget, more marketing teams, more developers, more testers (well, hypothetically anyway), more control over the market and so on. That is all true.
But ultimately you could totally build the majority of the things they build yourself, as long as you set realistic goals. (Whether you *should* do that is a case-by-case question, of course...)
re: advice to independent software developers
@KuJoe Honestly, even in those cases the custom thing is usually made with commodity processes and parts (just optimized to their specific needs, as opposed to general-purpose tradeoff choices).
Custom hardware definitely requires some capital investment, but often you can get surprisingly close with stuff like affordable off-the-shelf FPGAs.
@jalcine 🤦♂️
"Help! Someone stole my... uh... plagiarism bot...?"
Sometimes I feel like pain in the ass to some moderation teams I'm in. I tend to bring up that some actions of other moderation team members are unfair towards moderated users and this usually results in some members of moderation not being very enthusiastic about interacting with me.
I think as much as we try, there will always be a power difference between moderators and users with no moderation powers, and moderators always ought to mind that and consider it a bias so to try and eliminate it from their actions.
Moderators should always look from the eyes of moderated and consider whether moderation action against them would be fair. Try to give benefit of doubt.
advice to independent software developers
Speaking from many years of experience with software development, personally and professionally: There's really nothing special about the stuff that large tech companies do, actually.
In the vast majority of cases where it looks like they have some magical technology that's miles ahead of what's publicly known/available, in reality they're using the same commodity tools and techniques that you are using, they've just papered over the sharp edges with marketing / manual labour / UI design / etc.
Sure, they have more budget, more marketing teams, more developers, more testers (well, hypothetically anyway), more control over the market and so on. That is all true.
But ultimately you could totally build the majority of the things they build yourself, as long as you set realistic goals. (Whether you *should* do that is a case-by-case question, of course...)
@donaldball @baldur Honestly, it's probably a lot simpler: the only way to differentiate yourself as a new advertising broker is to claim to have data that your competitors don't, and so it's in the direct financial interest for adtech companies (including but definitely not limited to Google) to insist that behavioural advertising is not only effective, but *crucial*.
Because if you can't convince advertisers of that, you don't have a business; you can't get fat profit margins from brokering commodity contextual advertising spots, because anyone can offer those, so you have to invent some special sauce that justifies your existence and cut, whether it really exists or not.
“Adactio: Journal—Ad tech”
https://adactio.com/journal/21285
> But the idea that behavioural advertising works better than contextual advertising has no basis in reality.
@mdione @ebel FWIW, they can sometimes be revived by leaving them on a (safe, suitable) charger for a *very long* time, on the order of days or weeks.
(On the point of replacing e-readers, I'd recommend looking at other e-ink options as well - I've been quite happy with my Pocketbook, also in terms of durability. Much better than the Kobo I had before, which didn't survive a single low drop...)
Calling All Blind and Low Vision Users!
Exciting news! I’ve reached out to Apple Accessibility, and they’re on board to collaborate with us. They’ve asked me to put together a team so we can work directly with their team and engineers.
Are you passionate about improving accessibility features for blind and low vision users? Do you use VoiceOver, Zoom, or other low vision features on your devices? We need your help!
We’re looking for individuals who are interested in providing feedback and testing new features from our point of view. Your input will be invaluable in making technology more accessible for everyone.
If you’re interested in participating, please fill out the form below:
https://forms.microsoft.com/r/eRQAsmMb7C
Let’s make a difference together!
Feel free to share this post.
Best,
Matthew Whitaker
#Accessibility #BlindUsers #LowVision #VoiceOver #Zoom #AppleAccessibility #TechForAll #Inclusion #AccessibilityMatters #blind #lowvision
"The privacy invading feature that was patched into your browser and silently turned on by default was announced on our browser's blog 2 years ago so why are you so mad?"
My dude I'm probably in the top 0.01% of humans alive advocating for your product and I have never read your fucking blog because even I think "keeping up on the blog of the browser I use" is a fucking weirdo move
a related issue with vague licenses re: thoughts about legally shaky software licenses, somewhat hot take
@packbat Yep. That's exactly the sort of thing I was alluding to with "only a threat to the least privileged people".
Copyright as a whole is a system of hierarchical power, a system of oppression; and as systems of hierarchical power always do, they might *claim* to protect the most vulnerable, but in practice they're a big hammer for the most privileged.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.