Show newer

Like, if you genuinely want to "have a broader conversation with the community", maybe you should actually give three shits about accessibility, instead of pre-selecting for well-off white tech dudes by your choice of venue?

Show thread

OpenSSF: "We encourage everyone to join in on the conversation in the next days and weeks around FOSS supply chain security!"

Also OpenSSF: "We will be having that conversation at a physical event in North America [that many people will not be able to travel to, particularly those who are already underfunded and therefore at risk of maintainer compromise]."

Fucking 'foundations', every fucking time.

@martijn @aral Also a venture capital backed startup, but a different one.

(With very much the same playbook of "present itself as a revolutionary change over Node.js while conveniently failing to mention that all of its supposed improvements could have been contributed to Node.js instead, but weren't")

long, UBI, tech 

@ramsey This wasn't "trying to turn this into an argument". You asked for clarification; and I provided clarification, as requested...

I guess the takeaway from the xz backdoor situation is:

If you’re an open-source project maintainer, and somebody starts getting on your case for not doing enough free work for them, you reply “big Jia Tan energy there” and then block them forever.

Kan me nog steeds niet aan de indruk onttrekken dat SIDN de eisen gewoon zo opgesteld heeft dat AWS eigenlijk de enige optie is, en dat de komende 5-10 jaar ook gewoon blijft.

Met dan een mooi verhaaltje er naast over hoe, mocht het ooit mogelijk gaan zijn, ze altijd over kunnen stappen naar een andere partij. Want, ook al kiezen ze voor AWS omdat AWS de enige is die het kan leveren, ze zitten er niet aan vast hoor! 🤪

sidn.nl/nieuws-en-blogs/het-wa

@mejofi Dit lijkt me nou typisch zo'n gevalletje van "dan pas je de requirements maar aan, want deze uitkomst is niet acceptabel"

are there any microsd cards that are made for using as swap space?

I'm willing to say no #IPv6 support could be considered a class issue.

Old and wealthy western ISPs don't care because they hold onto an /8 or something and can live like that for the next 2 decades with NAT and NAT444.

But new, small, local ISPs or ISPs in developing parts of the world struggle with IPv4 availability the most, barely having any to do NAT444 for their customers, hurting performance even further in regions that already suffer from not the best network access

long, UBI, tech 

@ramsey No; rather that we should acknowledge that open-source development isn't the first to have this sort of situation, and hasn't created a unique circumstance.

There's a bit of a recurring problem where folks in tech communities rediscover social dynamics that many people outside tech have already dealt with for a long time (see eg. the "you reinvented the bus" memes), and then present them as some sort of novel revelation, without ever acknowledging the work that folks outside of tech have put into it in years prior.

This sort of exceptionalism also tends to creep into narratives about technology as a positive force; the discussion around UBI and open-source, but also for example the notion that "having computers means we no longer need to labour" (which isn't really any more true than it was after the invention of industrial machines).

That exceptionalism has a tendency of not just ignoring the lessons from history (like how there have always been good reasons for UBI, and plenty of data to support it, and it was buried for political reasons instead), but also of creating a further divide between "tech people" and "non-tech people"; where the progressive systems that take advantage of these 'novel' insights only really cater for the tech folks.

For UBI, this has already sort of been happening with some privately-run collective UBI-like schemes where only folks in tech are eligible. Sometimes to the detriment of solidarity and collective action towards introducing a true UBI for *everyone*, because tech folks then end up pulling up the ladder behind them.

So all I'm saying here, basically, is: yes, open-source development *is* a good argument for UBI, but it is not an exceptional one - and we should not treat it as such, lest we end up with a watered-down system that only really benefits the relatively-powerful few in tech.

Instead, we should see open-source development as just one of many forms of community work, all of which *as a category* are a very good reason for UBI, and should be presented *as a category* for the purpose of solidarity.

It's a good thing to always question social norms, but... that involves more than just being contrarian - you actually need to do the work of understanding why they are what they are, and go from there.

If you're ignoring people's requests to behave in a certain way, and at the same time you claim you "don't care" to learn the reason that people are asking that, you are not being critical of social norms - you're just being a self-serving asshole.

If you've done the work, proactively looked into it, *really* understood the reason, and concluded that the reason is just a bad one (eg. upholding oppressive norms) - then by all means, ignore those social norms. But show that you've done the work first.

(This is aimed not just at outright bigots, but also at eg. activists who argue for accelerationism, those who uphold one type of oppression and justify it by claiming to fight another, etc.)

idk how many people fall for the holistic psychologists grift

but like

she is a grifter. she is a fake. she is a white supremacist with a pretty mask.

please dont follow her

autistic people will really get bored one day and end up finding a vulnerability with a CVE score of 9.3

Does anyone know of an Omnivore-like read-later app, but explicitly non-commercial (and FOSS), while still having a similar featureset?

I'm specifically looking to avoid anything that has a business attached to it now or in the future, or anything that follows tech hypes (like "AI integration").

@mynameistillian Like, it's better than many other games to be clear, but I still wouldn't consider it a good example of the mechanic :p

@mynameistillian (Assuming this was about the 'make your ship your home' thing) yes, but only to a very limited degree; using only the items/furniture you collect pretty much, and it's all pretty space-constrained and doesn't provide a lot of flexibility in practice

so many space games seem completely opposed to letting you use your ship as housing and i wonder how much of it can be attributed to anti-traveller bias.

Pre-internet: only know people who are generally around you

Early internet: finding your rare little slice of culture all over the globe!!

Social internet: oh no this machine exists for starting fights

Now internet: using every tool available to go narrow, narrow, narrow, back to huddling amongst the people who are “generally around you”, but, like, spiritually. And from anywhere in the whole world.

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.