re: constructive sabotage idea for anti-capitalists
@pinoaffe (Note that they usually won't *tell* you that someone else told them to; they will just insist that they need the feature and be incredibly vague as to why, or come up with an explanation/usecase that doesn't make sense)
re: constructive sabotage idea for anti-capitalists
@pinoaffe Ah, right - that's going to be dependent on the type of software, usually, but a good first pass is "hyperoptimize it for non-commercial use where no money changes hands"; like, deliberately build things without room for a billing mechanism or customer management, for example (eg. no ability to suspend an account for non-payment).
Another good one (though it requires more care to not introduce eg. unintended accessibility issues) is to design around a rigid way of using the system, especially around reporting.
Corporate users often need the software to work in very specific ways because "the manager said they want a report in such-and-such format" regardless of whether that actually makes sense, and every such reported issue that you can answer with "we have no intention of supporting this, _____ should be good enough" is a win.
It does take some experience, but after a while you'll learn to spot the complaints and feature requests that are obviously for corporate use, vs. those of individuals or collectives. "Needs a feature or change because someone else told them to, rather than because it solves a clear problem" is the major red flag.
re: constructive sabotage idea for anti-capitalists
@pinoaffe That's the process of gradually making it shittier (for corporate use) but never to such a degree that it's bad enough for them to jump ship
re: constructive sabotage idea for anti-capitalists
(Note that for this to be a net positive to an anti-capitalist cause, the 'clearly better' needs to be on an axis *other than* business efficiency)
constructive sabotage idea for anti-capitalists
Build FOSS software that's clearly better than the alternatives, but make it *exactly* the right amount of hostile-to-corporations; so that it is frustrating to use and slows down business processes, but isn't *so* bad that it justifies buying or developing an alternative
Take advantage of corporations' inability to see the long-term costs resulting from short-term savings. If they can enshittify our software, we can enshittify theirs
Also works with existing projects that are already widely adopted by corporations
Who is working on accessibility of maths _research_?
I know lots of people looking at improving maths education, but is there anything interesting happening in research?
The only ideas I have at the moment are to talk to @pkra; Volker Sorge's work on spoken maths in MathJax; and the arXiv team's work on converting preprints to HTML.
Are there any physical disability issues that affect research mathematicians?
So have I got this right?
We've known for about a decade (and had reasonable suspicions for about 2 decades) that the Post Office #Horizon system was well dodgy and people were being wrongly convicted, but the government are finally acting now because someone made a telly programme about it?
Could someone maybe make a telly programme about #ClimateChange?
i saw this url and i love it lmao https://homophobicshitcoinbrowser.com
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.