Show newer

I almost can't believe I need to repeat this, but: the "nice" companies are the *most dangerous* ones.

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@stonehead It's certainly possible for them to use the tech, it is open after all. But that doesn't mean that they will be accepted as part of the existing community, which is what the defederation part is about.

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@untitaker@hachyderm.io These are the consequences of inviting corporations onto your platform, like it or not. I am not interested in a debate about this. This was a heads-up so people have a chance to move before defederation inevitably occurs.

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@reto@pleroma.labrat.space Great for you. I don't really care. I am not here to have a discussion about the relative merits of capitalism, and this was a heads-up, not an invitation for debate.

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

Can the corporate apologists kindly stop replying to this with some variation of "not all corporations are bad"?

You are not telling me anything I haven't heard a thousand times in my time on this earth, and there is a *reason* I am not considering it as a valid counterargument.

Maybe think about why that is, before assuming that I must just be clueless on the matter.

Show thread

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@untitaker@hachyderm.io You don't "combat corporate capture" by inviting corporations. You do so by keeping them out of your spaces.

A Linux audio driver walks into a bar

Bartender: "what would you like?"

pulseaudio[18814]: No object for name "alsa_output.pci-0000_04_00.1.hdmi-stereo"

Bartender: "I can't hear you?"

pulseaudio[18814]: core-util.c: Failed to connect to system bus: Did not receive a reply

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@kitten I mean, in fairness, you are decidedly not corporation-friendly :p

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@jtolio@hachyderm.io Sure. Like I said, you can make a different choice for your instance's culture, and you are free to do so.

But as stated, the consequence of that will be defederation from many other instances - that is how it's *designed* to work.

And my problem is with the repeated implications that this is somehow an undesirable thing that should be avoided, particularly implying that marginalized folks should be the ones doing the work of avoiding it.

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@jtolio@hachyderm.io I am well aware of the historical racism problems on fedi, and they absolutely need to be worked on.

But Black folks are also not a pawn to defend corporate invasion of a community space with. It has no place in this particular conversation.

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@jtolio@hachyderm.io Yeah, no, that's not how it works. Many people here (again, the people who have built the place to be a safe refuge) have absolutely no interest in a 'town square', and it is frankly quite privileged and rude to say "the town square is coming anyway" - it's an extremely colonialist attitude, "thanks for building this, it's ours now".

And instances are likely to respond appropriately by defederating from instances and folks who hold that view. Which means you don't have your town square anyway.

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@jtolio@hachyderm.io That's precisely *why* we're pushing back on these changes.

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@jtolio@hachyderm.io That vibe is very much deliberate. This is a community built by marginalized folks who were basically not welcome anywhere else, and we've made our home here, and there are certain house rules. There is no desire to turn this into a "public town square" or a "Twitter replacement".

See also hughrundle.net/home-invasion/ for more background on that

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@jtolio@hachyderm.io No, they don't. Despite widespread belief otherwise (in tech circles in particular). *Particularly* not on fedi, which was basically built by marginalized folks to be a place of empathy.

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@stonehead I've explained the reasons a bit more here: social.pixie.town/@joepie91/10

And more fundamentally, fedi doesn't need to "reflect society" at all, it's a community platform run by volunteers for their own community building and social lives. There are entire swathes of society that we'd much rather not have here at all.

The whole "must reflect society" thing is basically just Twitter's "global town square" thing, but that doesn't apply here

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@jtolio@hachyderm.io The problem that many folks have with corporations isn't that they're "not playing by the rules", though. It's that they *exist*, particularly in a community environment. There is no set of rules that can solve that problem.

Corporations will always, *always* act in their own best interest first, no matter how nice and hacker-y their outward communications may be, and no matter who runs the place. It is their reason for existence, part of the fundamental fabric of what makes a corporation a corporation.

In other words: they can never be genuine community participants, because they are always there for selfish reasons, not for the sake of the community. "Playing nice" just means that those reasons are more carefully disguised.

Thus: many people just don't want them here, regardless of the circumstances.

luring all the corporations onto a mastodon instance and then throwing the server down a well, thereby killing all the corporations instantly, the curse is lifted

re: meta, hachyderm, corporate capture 

@jtolio@hachyderm.io That is your choice, of course - half the point of a federated network is that people can make that choice for themselves, so that's completely fine.

This is just a heads-up to let people know that that sort of policy is generally not appreciated in much of the fediverse (this is certainly not just about pixie.town), and so it is a likely reason for future defederation.

Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.