meta (infosec, twitter)
@whreq Heh :p
@whreq Ik moet zeggen dat ik daar steeds minder hoopvol over ben...
@whreq Kliko?
Computer shop talk but fun
Tech 2: I put Unigine on there to benchmark it and it was... It was really good.
Me: Yeah.
Anyway, later, after they oogled the deck a bit, I asked if the price they charged was their normal 'full clean and service' price because it was cheap.
Tech 2: *nervous giggle* I er, I gave you a discount *blush* I was um, I was working on it, so uh, yeah, I was working on it anyway so, uh, I gave you a discount
I think 'working on' might have meant 'gaming' XD XD
CW meta
@yosh Heavily dependent on the reasons IMO. For lived experience and such, I agree.
But I've also seen folks (primarily the wealthy white 'electoral' Twitter crowd) literally argue "why should I care about people who can't handle this, they need to seek help" and invoking straight-up colonialist rhetoric. In that context it's unacceptable IMO.
fediblock rec meta
i've seen it going around, mostly from one user who came here in the last ten days, that #fediblock is "not to be used for individual users" and that it is "only for admins"
don't listen to that person, they are *wrong.* #fediblock was started by @CaribenxMarciaX as a way of letting communities protect themselves from bad actors and instances.
i repeat: #fediblock is EXPLICITLY open to everyone to report red flag users AND instances, and it has been for YEARS
meta
@pingiun While yes, that *is* probably a factor, it's also important to keep in mind that that's not *technical* difficulty, but people having to get used to an environment that prioritizes the collective over the individual - something that has been pretty much extinct in social media for years now.
I don't think it is avoidable (it's basically re-learning a skill), nor that it is necessarily a problem if people bounce off because of it (for now), considering how overburdened everybody already is dealing with the influx.
Yesterday I posted about worries re. moderation at mastodon.social/.online:
https://www.patreon.com/posts/on-our-policy-74436103
And asked the community to feed back about whether they'd like to do nothing, 'silence', or 'defederate'. The response was almost entirely in favour of silencing.
Today, especially after noticing that those two instances DO federate with an instance that hosts fascist content, we went ahead with that silence:
https://www.patreon.com/posts/74474015
Thank you, .art, for supporting a solid no-nazi stance. <3
re: here's my take on federation and blocking and all that
why do we have a system for advertising instances unworthy of federating with but not one for advertising the good instances?
here's my take on federation and blocking and all that
on a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 is fully blocked and 10 is fully federating, it sucks that our current system is to make every instance a 10 automatically and then only with manual admin action turn that to a 1 or a 3
turning it to a 0 requires direct firewall access because even with authenticated fetch mastodon still sometimes voluntarily sends information to instances you have blocked
some instances (this one included) have public blocklists, which is a nice way to gauge an instance's morals, but a very bad way to actually deal with instances worthy of being blocked because doing so would require admins to constantly re-read the block lists of instances they trust and play "spot the difference"
and if your software is creating work rather than making work easier, you've created a bad game rather than a good tool
so here's my multi-part proposal:
don't instantly fully trust new instances. it's too easy for a bad actor to simply switch domain names and become fully trusted again. we've seen it hundreds of times.
allow automatic sharing of instance trust information. basically, an admin would enter information they know about another instance into a box, along with evidence and a verdict on what level of federation should be done, and that information would be immediately shared to other instances that have established mutual trust.
trust for federation information could be anything from "ignore" to "notify admins" to "automatically apply", on a per-domain basis.
establish a better entry procedure into federation. why can't we have a setting to notify admins about new instances so they can proactively vet them?
and finally, as long as we're giving admins more control over federation, why don't we also extend that to reports? the current system where a user can report a remote post and has to choose at the time of the report whether to send it to the remote instance sucks. that should be an admin decision, and reports should be able to be forwarded to any instance, not just the reported one.
of course we'll never get any of this until website boy stops running the show, because twitter doesn't have any federation-based moderation features either
fedi meta +
Ok ngl, silencing social/online have actually made the federated timeline way better. Not having to see five million newcomers being confused about this place is refreshing. I can see actually interesting stuff by people and also wow so many instances i don’t recognize because they’re usually drowned by the two Big Ones.
CW meta
@blondino@c.im @tom4okstate@masto.ai So on the one hand, yes, more precise CWs are useful, but that also places more of a burden on the author, and I can understand that being a problem too. That's definitely a contextual "balance of interests" thing.
On the other hand, though, this isn't as much of a problem anyway as it might seem. The way a lot of people interact with CWs isn't to *avoid* those toots, but rather to look at them at a time where they feel able to do so. It's much more about "when" than about "whether" to look at it.
There's a longer explanation I've written about that here: https://social.pixie.town/@joepie91/109320224316260868
(Aside, my previous comment was incomplete; it doesn't just show up in the federated feed itself, but also in anything else federation-based, like the hashtag search)
re: Racism on Mastodon
@analogist @celesteh @vfrmedia @scanlime @ariadne@treehouse.systems @timnitGebru This seems like an odd premise, considering how infamous the big instances are for ongoing moderation quality/responsiveness issues.
Racism on Mastodon
Whats our plan for racists on the fediverse? I was just excited by seeing #BlackMastodon yesterday and today I see people I was happy to see on here have already faced harassment.
Seeing some longtime fedi creatures patiently explain the culture here to folks from the birdsite influx, sometimes dealing with unnecessarily combative attitudes in response. Please take breaks when you need to.
Thank you to those that have come here and have taken the time to listen and adapt to the gentler atmosphere we've cultivated here.
In the process of moving to @joepie91. This account will stay active for the foreseeable future! But please also follow the other one.
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.