Show newer

politics, petitions 

Your periodic reminder that government petitions are absolutely useless. Yes, even the ones that promise it'll be discussed in parliament or whatever. It'll be superficially "discussed" for 5 minutes and then discarded, to tick the box.

The real purpose of government petitions is to redirect people's anger about harmful policies to an "accountability sink" - something that *looks* like accountability, but really only serves to satisfy people emotionally and sweep the issue under the carpet.

TL;DR: You'll feel like you've "done something", so you won't be an actual threat to the government's position anymore.

You create change by organizing and *demanding* it, with whichever degree of severity is necessary to get there. Not by asking for it.

spent my first 3 hours this day (i skipped morning class to catch up on some sleep) getting a bunch of important tasks done, so excited to just sit down and get some coding done now

And calling it externalities as though it's just a little minor quirk of an otherwise logical system is part of the gaslighting. It **is** the system, because racialized and economic power and privilege gets to determine what "counts" and what (or who) doesn't.

Yields per acre are so much higher and thus production costs so much lower with synthetic nitrogen fertilizer. Except for the dead zones in the oceans. Except for the loss of fishing livelihoods in the dead zones. Except for the reliance on distance sources of fertilizer.

Show thread

You can make anything look efficient and profitable if there is a social compact to not count some of the costs.

Ah yes this fossil fuel stuff is so energy dense & so cheap. Except for the undrinkable water. Except for the acid rain. Except for the air pollution (and thus the asthma, premature birth and dementia). Except for the wars over it. Except for the climate change. Except for the roads needed to use it to move around. Except for the parking needed for the stuff needed to use the roads

GoToSocial (so far) has been trying to maintain compatibility with the Mastodon API, to maximize the number of clients compatible with our ActivityPub server implementation. The Mastodon "base" API implementation is still underway (e.g. we're missing lists), but we have been aware of the fact that maintaining API compatibility with all future features would forever have us in a state of "catch-up".

Given recent announcements about the direction that Mastodon development is being taken, and our own fears about the future of the Mastodon project, we are declaring a cut-off point. GoToSocial will only be attempting to maintain Mastodon API compatibility up to the current stable version, that is, v4.1.2.

Now this does not mean that we will never implement future features of Mastodon, it just gives us more flexibility in exactly what and how we implement things, especially when it comes to the more ethically complex ones (looking at you, search!).

also got my first set of contact lenses to try out, quite nice so far

Show thread

ooh great, replacing the frame on my broken glasses unexpectedly did fall under warranty

hey at least I have no difficulty touching my eye (it's important for contacts)

Meta / Mastodon 

@deadsuperhero he shouldn't need to be forced and people harmed in order for these changes, somebody with that power in the architecture of a theoretically infinite social space should pre-empt or listen to people pre-empting these situations before they become situations. This is definitely the "too little too late" network for so long as it's one guy at the top is calling all the shots based on whatever works for him. None of this is new problems :ACNH_Sighing:

Meta / Mastodon 

Quote posts and broader search capabilities here without more effective privacy and moderation tools being delivered first will be insufferable very quickly. You can search for this toot and quote me on that later.

meta 

You know what *really* pisses me off about Eugen's announcement?

That he *knows* that this is a sensitive topic, and yet he couldn't be fucked to include any details about whether it will, for instance, respect consent.

fuck i thought this implementation would be easy but i have to do actual code architecting aaaa

I did find an article by the same author which is very interesting as well,
Drivers of Disruption: How Jakarta's Mobility Platform Drivers Understand, Transform
and Resist the Algorithms that Manage Them [(Qadri, 2022)](dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/1)

Show thread

:boosts_ok_gay:​ Unfortunately wasn't able to find the full text for this anywhere, even sci-hub etc just have a single-page pdf with just the abstract. Emailed the author, but if anyone could find it that'd be greatly appreciated! dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3375627

Show thread

Found after one of the passages in the article ["Algorithmized but not Atomized? How Digital Platforms Engender New Forms of Worker Solidarity in Jakarta" (Qadri, 2020)](dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/337)

Which analyses 'tuyul apps', third-party apps that enhance the gigworker's official apps in favor of the workers

Show thread

ahh also found the article I read recently that highlights some of the digital challenges modern unionization faces pluralistic.net/2023/04/12/alg

Show thread
Show older
Pixietown

Small server part of the pixie.town infrastructure. Registration is closed.