‍fuchsiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa @f0x@pixie.town

@goat@hellsite.site good sleepy

@Shrigglepuss Maybeshedid

@researchfairy to view live logs for a service that's misbehaving, `journalctl -fu <name`

frogs who the fuck designed this

fuck i thought this implementation would be easy but i have to do actual code architecting aaaa

I did find an article by the same author which is very interesting as well,
Drivers of Disruption: How Jakarta's Mobility Platform Drivers Understand, Transform
and Resist the Algorithms that Manage Them [(Qadri, 2022)](https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/146296)

@steph@toot.party yeah not sure either, it was submitted to that conference but not sure about elsewhere

Found after one of the passages in the article ["Algorithmized but not Atomized? How Digital Platforms Engender New Forms of Worker Solidarity in Jakarta" (Qadri, 2020)](https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3375627.3375816)

Which analyses 'tuyul apps', third-party apps that enhance the gigworker's official apps in favor of the workers

ahh also found the article I read recently that highlights some of the digital challenges modern unionization faces https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/12/algorithmic-wage-discrimination/

im going to #disrupt the union market

@tastytea@very.tastytea.de apparently it's used "by some older speakers" lol, I think laundromat is more common, it's a genericized trademark

> Our digital tools are new, the forms of work that they mediate are new, and many of
the challenges they raise are new. But, in a world where the atomization of work continues
to be used against digital workers, let’s not forget an old rallying cry that has served us well:
workers of the world, unite

all from ["Why the digital gig economy needs co-ops and unions"](https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:11c7f4d1-2d71-4301-9fbe-627626ff0176)

> [B]uilding on Gina Neff’s work so that this so-called ‘venture labour’ -the “explicit expression of entrepreneurial values by non-entrepreneurs" does not become the norm. In other words, workers recognizing that they
are receiving all of the risks of entrepreneurship, but few of the rewards

> But if people see themselves as workers rather than entrepreneurs, then we have more possibilities for workers to collaborative attempt to help each other through cooperative horizontal relations

this is why everyone that calls themselves an "entrepreneur" is not to be trusted tbh

@erincandescent@queer.af I guess so, but those would still pose a challenge for anything that restricts replies, like a 'reply proxy'. You're essentially creating a second type of blocklist/allowlist for replies, with the same challenges as federation block/allowlists?

@erincandescent@queer.af while I definitely agree with the need for more fine-grained control, is the use-case for automatic approval not already handled by enabling authorized fetch?