What im trying to say is we should stop looking at sexuality as this static thing, and while it's true you are what you say you are, you should be open to new experiences changing your sexuality etc
I totally agree with the concept that you're still sexuality X even if you've never had experience with (some of) the gender(s) you're attracted to
My personal experience tho, lol
I thought I was bi, then had a few experiences with men/masculine genders and realised I'm not actually attracted to them lol
The American left needs to get organized. I know you're out there. I meet so many people who self-identify as socialists. Recent rallies in Vermont had tens of thousands of people come out, but at every other kind of organizing, be it a meeting, canvassing, strike support, phone bank, etc., there are the same few dozen people every single time.
People in power know this. They used to get nervous when they saw huge rallies, but they've learned that they don't represent an organized threat.
A reminder that the anti-Iraq-war protests were some of the largest demonstrations in human history and they failed. The "carrying signs and yelling at empty buildings" theory of change comes from a sanitized retelling of past movements.
Today, every group with a twitter is calling for a demonstration in their town, but movements that don't cause power to feel pain and don't have the institutional capacity to negotiate if/when they do are doomed to failure.
Ever seen an ad for ground.news and wondered where they get their data? Well, they too get it from Dave. Depending on the metric, they average his scores with either 1 or 2 other so-called "trusted ratings systems."
He uses a comically naive rubric to generate the data. It is the exact political theory that just-some-guy-named Dave would have. Had the site been DavesOpinions.com, no one would use it. Transmorgify them into data, pick a neutral name, and make a UI, and researchers use it credulously without even knowing who Dave is, yet upon him rest the conclusions of hundreds if not thousands of studies (>500 on arxiv alone), representing unknowable amounts of computation and thousands of hours of labor.
Digging further, we find that MediaBiasFactCheck.com isn't run by, say, a lab, or a panel of experts, but is just some guy named Dave. Dave is a healthcare worker in North Carolina with a passion for bias in the media working with a couple volunteers. According to the site, he makes all final editorial decisions.
Our paper's sources leads us, through several schema transformations and an intermediary, to MediaBiasFactCheck.com, a commonly used source for those studying misinformation, media bias, etc. It rates The New York Times as further left than @FAIR, an explicitly progressive outlet, which regularly criticizes NYT for being a right-wing rag (my words, not theirs). This is obviously wrong.
Since 2016, the number of papers on mis/disinformation has skyrocketed. It's hard to imagine another phenomenon for which there exists such a complete dataset, but this field must label things as true, biased, etc., sticky concepts to define at scale. How can you label millions of tweets as true/false?
If we pick a paper and follow the provenance of its data, I think that we can learn about not just this field, but the role of data and computation in society.
HEY!
HEY YOU
THIS IS URGENT
iggydinosaur.bsky.social needs a kidney transplant. they suffer from a genetic disease and need a kidney donor who can save their life. the situation is extremely dire.
if you are an eligible kidney donor or want to find out if you can help, please check out their bluesky post and website
*your location MAY NOT be an obstacle. if you are willing to help, they'll find a way to fly you out.*
https://bsky.app/profile/iggydinosaur.bsky.social/post/3lsk4gxqgzc2f
I've been using my Promistreams packages in production code for quite a while now, including very complex high-concurrency usecases, and it has worked fine. I've tested it with very complex testcases, and that worked fine too.
And now I wrote a quick proof-of-concept for something using them, and suddenly that proof-of-concept starts exposing race condition bugs in my Promistream packages for a week and ongoing??
I don't understand software sometimes. Including my own.
And it's honestly kind of wild to me how many software developers are very pedantic about tracking every possible *code* issue as a bug, but not even considering doing half of that work for *documentation* issues
Anyone know of a good IRC client for the #blind? I wanna use IRC.
me: so I have some ceramics I want to bake
kleinanzeigen: oh yeah can do
me: oh right, I also need to water my horses
kleinanzeigen: gotcha
me: oh and before Iforget, i'm also looking for a kettle to boil sausages in
kleinanzeigen: you won't fucking believe this but
"The project of Gender is one that was/is explicitly deployed as a tool of the settler colonial project on the land mass we know as the 'Americas' including 'Canada,' forcibly deployed onto indigenous nations in an attempt to eradicate indigeneity (nokizaru 4-5). This was done due to the fact that a vast majority of indigenous nations not only structured their socialites in non-patriarchal makeups, but specifically had conceptions of gender that did not at all correlate with the European model (Lugones 25). "
-- Chris Coles, "Paradigmatic Bio-Logic: Against Biology and Towards Translife." p. 28
Technical debt collector and general hype-hater. Early 30s, non-binary, ND, poly, relationship anarchist, generally queer.
- No alt text (request) = no boost.
- Boosts OK for all boostable posts.
- DMs are open.
- Flirting welcome, but be explicit if you want something out of it!
- The devil doesn't need an advocate; no combative arguing in my mentions.
Sometimes horny on main (behind CW), very much into kink (bondage, freeuse, CNC, and other stuff), and believe it or not, very much a submissive bottom :p
My spoons are limited, so I may not always have the energy to respond to messages.
Strong views about abolishing oppression, hierarchy, agency, and self-governance - but I also trust people by default and give them room to grow, unless they give me reason not to. That all also applies to technology and how it's built.